Skip to content

General Issues / Questions

This area deals with any general questions/issues regarding God / Islam / Quran not covered under other headings.

This category can be followed from the open social web via the handle [email protected]

7.2k Topics 133.2k Posts
  • Do you believe Homosexuality is acceptable to God?

    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    544 Views
    Y
    Hello Mr. Neo, I read another message of yours, and apparently, you do take them to mean the same thing. Sorry, it was too early to ask. Anwar Azim Peace Mr. Neo, Seeing as the only unforgivable sin is that of not believing in Allah, I'd say that yes Allah does 'accept' homosexuality, the same way Allah accepts/forgives other sins. Is it "not believing in Allah" or "shirk"? Do you take them to be the same meaning? Anwar Azim
  • Reincarnation

    112
    0 Votes
    112 Posts
    4k Views
    U
    Peace be upon you all, Just wanted to add that the Khamitans (ancient egypt) believed and promoted reincarnation, and this is where the greeks and many others came to learn life sciences. I am told that if you master meditation (breathinig, posture, etc) that one can see back to a previous life. But of course I have not confirmed that for myself. But I am indeed practicing meditation and working on my health which is a very important factor in spirituality. If your vehicle is faulty you cant get very far.
  • diversifacation at free minds

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    8 Views
    U
    peace zenje, If you don't mind I'll add my (literal) 2 bits. 16. People of other religions 17. Aethists/Agnostics, etc. thanks for your input, you said that people adress the members of this forum as one group, i do that sometimes, inadvertantly. using the deductive process, one could learn about others by what they say, the eye-contacts they give you and a combination of both(how they describe the messsage they want to get across) and what they do, (which we, unfortunately, wouldn't spy on other people using this forum ) peace, rifat
  • The Heavenly Feud Account

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    82 Views
    A
    Peace, Yes, i understand, and i had the same dillema too. But you have to understand that it is the higher thinking that will cause people to as much as they can to bring 'heaven' to everybody. You say you want a verse that tell you directly that heaven can be attained here on earth, then first you have to understand that heaven is not a physical place, but a state of mind, that will be continued in the next life. So if you take of your glasses of 'heaven is only in the next life', then you will see that the Quran says as much about Djenna in this life as in the next. Most people in the western world are trapped in their illusion, their hell, that they don't really care about the starving people in this world. Their Jahim=barriere stops them from really caring and helping. You have to understand is that you can be in the most miserable place, and still be in the heaven of your mind, even though there is so much misery in this world, i feel the bliss of accepting the truth and reality. That is heaven, accepting the truth and knowing what to do with reality. Most people in this world are stuck in their own made hell of illusions, that will stop them from growing their selfs(nafs). Most western people know there are people starving every day on the other side of the earth, but still they keep their money for themselves, still don't help the people over there, because their Jahim=barriere in thinking causes them not to make the right decisions. Imagine if people would save money for a while and then go to Africa themselves to help people over there, not just some little groups, imagine that every person on earth would feel this responsibility, then the problem would be solved. A lot of problems would be solved if it was handled like this, but people are stuck in their illusion they live now, the illusion of the importants of work, of going on holiday and so on. They know they're wrong, so this knowing they're wrong will stop them from growing, and by thus creating hell for others. If people would understand reality and the truth, that they're created, that this life is real, because most people live in doubt whole their lives, then they would understand that just taking action is possible for them, most people live in the illusion that they can't help those people, they say that to themselves. If nobody had listened to Hitler or other leaders because they would understand reality, then there wouldn't be wars. Because then we wouldn't create hells that are results of our inner hells, that fool themselves we have to listen to leaders, that it is a 'duty' to fight. Imagine if all the people would have stopped listening to Stalin, and would have looked at him, that they aren't scared anymore of him, when people realise that we give power to such people, that we can brake the cycle, then there would be more peace. It is because we don't act to serve real freedom, to give heaven to everybody, that will stop us also from attaining the higher level, because we know it is the truth. Then we arrive again on the starving people, on the people who are innocent victims of war or terror. Why are they the causulties of other peoples hells, of other peoples illusions? For a part they themselves are also stuck in their personal illusion, what keeps them from making the right decisions and actions. Don't jump yet, let me finish. If you understand reality, how it is structered and how its laws are and so on, it is like you trying to eat soup with a fork, because you don't understand the reality of the soup, how it is structered, then your stuck behind a barriere of growth and taking the right actions that will cause to give the right fruits in life. Most people on earth live like this, stuck in their man-made traditions and understandings of this world, these are all illusions, and they know deep inside that is true, but still they keep feeding their hell. So they are victims of the western people's hells, that don't give them the help the western world can really offer. And they are victims of their own made hells, their own made illusions. Put these together and we see the results on tv everyday. Everybody is eating life with a fork instead of a spoon, and will never grasp the real possibilities in this life and the next. How you believe this life to be, will cause you to act and behave in a certain way in this life, so if you believe in illusions, your actions will also be like illusions, because you will never understand the laws of cause and action God created, so people surrender themselves mostly to somebody else's illusion and let them be ruled by them(the people in politics, husband, village traditions, religion traditions and so on). God says in the Quran, that if people haven't reached the message, so they can brake away from their illusions, then they're not responsible, and will attain the higher thinking in the next life, that will take away all the grief they had in this life. But this shows that people how do have the revelation can reach a partial heaven, we can in this life reach a higher thinking that will move on to the next life. And this higher thinking will give results of bliss, because the truth is just pure bliss to me. It is sad still that kids are the victims of other people's illusions, but this will be forgotten in the next creation. But to attain this understanding, you have to be in an enviroment that allows that. So on earth we can only walk a little part of the stairs to the higher thinking. Only in the next life we can freely walk the stairs up. But you have to understand that it is our actions that will create a heaven and hell, not because God creates a mythological place where people burn or drink from rivers of milk. It is our behaviour in the next world that will make it a heaven for everybody. So this also applies to this life as well. So this life is not a test, it is a place where people must get rid of their illusions, otherwise they will take those with them to the next life. The people who didn't had no chance to develop their selfs, will not be held accountable for it, till they reached 40. God will not jduge people on that, and will them allow to leave their self-made hells, in the next life. But i believe God gives everybody the chance in their life, where ever you live, to reach a higher understanding, that will create results that are compared to rivers of milk. When we die our conciousness will return to the Quantum field, this is even proven trough research, and will be thus confronted with the truths that are stored in it. This will be like a confrontation with God, a 'meeting' with Him. God made a law that only by maintaining your illusions, your hells, your denials of the truth(kufr), that when we are created again after the new big-bang, they will continue to be stuck in their illusions and will not get out of it unless God wants to. But the persons who have reached a higher acceptance by acknowledging the truth, and the most important truths are believing in one God and live righteous(truth that coincides with your conciousness) and that you will be confronted with yourself(the last Day), are to be allowed to have a higher level in the next creation. People who develop an even higher thinking(Djenna=garden we can't see, because it is in our thinking) then they will have a higher level in the next life then the people who only had the 3 basic truth's, as told in sura 55. Then it is the higher understanding that will create ultimate bliss for everybody, while a part will still be stuck in their illusions, but will not be able to let their hell's their illusions, touch other people. There will a barriere, that will not give them any chance of effecting the next life, as people who have the higher understanding will have the power. I recommend also you to read my article on the afterlife http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=5417.0 As it will also give some insights how i think like i do. I'm still putting all the things together, also the question you gave me will be put into it. These are hard questions, but the Quran still gives me answers that coincides with what i say above. In time i will finish an article that eloborates on all these subjects. Peace
  • The Quran and modern science by Maurice Bucaille

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    17 Views
    A
    If any of the site moderators wants to post it on the site, i have more of his books, there are more sites who have posted these books, so i believe it is ok....
  • I need help from a Tech person

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    112 Views
    N
    Hi Layth, My guess was right, your server DOES NOT have frontpage extensions installed any more. Go to this url http//www.dnswiz.com/fptype.htm And type in free-minds.org WWW Site www.free-minds.org Port 80 Server Software Apache/2.0.46 (CentOS) FrontPage Extensions NO Good news however, the data is stored the way I wanted it, It can be transfered over to a new form program -) Nadeem.
  • The chicken or the egg?

    49
    0 Votes
    49 Posts
    1k Views
    N
    peace Neo, We test it against the laws of the universe. This creation. For example, if the quran says that if you throw something in the air it will come back down, we can do it ourselves and find out it is true. If the quran says that if we do good things, good things will happen to us, we can again test it by doing good things and we'll find out that it is also true. That's how we test it. It might not be exact science, but it is what science is based on. Religion and science are one and the same. Science is the study of God's creation. When we study this creation we are studying God. I understand what you're saying, but I have to disagree about religion and science being the same. Religion is based on the presumption on the existence of a deity, whereas science is based on nothing and works its way backwards through observation. These two are fundementally contradicting paradigms one must presuppose something to contain value (religion), the other must not presuppose anything by definition (science).
  • Some Of You Don't believe in "Allahu Akbar"?

    109
    0 Votes
    109 Posts
    4k Views
    S
    If you are what you claim you are, address the issues and don't waylay them by throwing in your red herrings as usual.
  • Going down the same road?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    15 Views
    Q
    Salaam everyone Thanks for your responses regarding the issue. Sister Elke, I didn't mean to imply that I don't believe in other messengers or books. I meant that the Quran is the only book of guidance for manking from Allah. The only one that exists in its purest form and Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was the one who it was revealed to. I agree that all Prophets before him were Muslims, but after them the people had divided into various sects. Prophet Muhammad was the last prophet to come and unite the people into one ummah. However, the main idea of my post was regarding unity and a common purpose. I didn't wish to imply that differences don't exist, but when differences become a hinderance to the common goal, it becomes an issue. Our goal is to show that the Quran is the clear guide for humanity, explained in detail by Allah. However, if we (the Quranites) can't even decide on a concept such as Salaat, what does it show the outsider? Is Quran really that clear? I mean all who claim 0,2,3,5 prayers in a day have verses to back up their points. This is just one example, but I see us going down the same road of sectarianism even though we are sort of united on one idea (the Quran is complete and fully detailed). To give you an analogy, the sunnis all believe in the Quran and the Sunnah as their main sources, but even then the Hanafi, Hanbali, Malaki, and Shafa'i "schools of thought" emerged. However, there are such fundamental differences between them and we question them and ask if the Sunnah is so clear why the differences. Should we not ask the same questions from our own selves as well. If the Quran is clear...then how come? All I am saying is that we have left behind the sectarianism of our ancestors, but are we falling into the same traps. Are we making it harder for people to see the truth, by having so many different interpretations. The problem I see is in the search for specifics. The Quran, intentionally, does not give specifics in many cases and that is because it is a message for all times and with changing times the specifics may change. For ex. commands such as "lengthen your garments" or "spend all that is beyond your need" are by no means specific. The Quran gives us general hudood and there is much flexibility therein. This is not because God forget, Allah is not short of any words, but because He knew that with changing times certain things will change. I see that the problem of all these fiqh schools arose when people desired to just determine every single specific thing for life. The Quran which had come as a guiding light for all humanity, was restricted to the interpretations of particular individuals. Allah taala warns us that the people before us did the same, inventing things never ordained by God and dividing into sects. Sorry, I think I might have digressed a little. The reason, I bring up the issue of Salaat or #of prayers is that it is probably the number one question asked by pro-hadith...if Quran is complete, then how do we pray? In our efforts to gather out details...I think we have forgotten what the main purpose of Quran is. If we can't even come up with a single # for the times of prayers, does it not prove the claim of the pro-hadith to be true? There are beautiful articles on this website that talk about Salaat as the Divine system that will embody all of the principles of Quran and show the world how heaven can be achieved on earth. I am not speaking of a utopian society, but a society that closely follows the laws given in the Quran. So, why then should we continue to argue about 2,3,5,0 prayers? Why not say that it is not the main purpose of Salaat. Prayer (or namaz) is a small part of the overall Salaat. Let us forget about these differences and focus on the main purpose of Salaat (establishing the Deen of Islam) and then the true Islamic government can address the issue and determine whatever # of salaat. I do realize that no one calls anyone else a kaafir or wrong for differing in the # of prayers, but I do feel (and I might be wrong) that such differences cause a hinderance for us to show the Muslims and the world at large, that the Quran is indeed clear. Again, just some thoughts. Please don't thikn the criticism is for this forum. I actually find the people on this forum more respective of opinions. I am referring to ALL Quranite movements.
  • Mind Boggling!!!

    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    269 Views
    S
    His only genius is tricking the world into thinking he is one. Sacrilege! ;D Let's take this down to the movie thread, I'm sure lot's can be discussed about Jackson's tendencies toward ingenuity or not D
  • Free-minds at the cost of Faith?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    86 Views
    V
    Sorry, I dont have time to further answer multiple persons yet,,,,I will do it InshaAllah . For the moment my point is that, I dont follow any sect but also I dont deny ahadith. I dislike the sectarianism very badly. But like the differece in thinking. Also, please dont always try to place sunnah to be something out of this world. sunnah explains quranic practice, Hece it does not add any thing, but just the class notes to understand the text book. It does neither add anything to Quran nor subtract nor contradict. If some hadith seem to be contradicting quran, then that is considered to be fake. And if anybody follows that hadith then I will be the first to object and ask for justification. I hope it clarifies my position. And please dont throw fire from your mouth toward sunnis. I gave the example of Dog for the extra freedom, no which people ever start attributing towards quranic verses (look at the ideology of phenix). If somebody has some ill desires then please dont subtract any verses from quran, but keep on doing sins and face the judgment day, but dont bother muslims (both sunnis and quran only). I hope it clarifies my position again. Regards. VirtualEye
  • MANY DISCREPENCIES ON THE FREE MIND FRONT PAGE

    48
    0 Votes
    48 Posts
    331 Views
    J
    Peace "tanveermd", "monoteistweb(Ian Mcnamara)" has been answred LOOOOOOONG ago by bro Bahman at http//www.y19.net/challenge.html "bahai library(lomax)" has been answered by bro Edip Yuksel LOOOOOOOOOONG ago at http//www.yuksel.org/e/religion/zebras.htm "Hardys" and "answring-islams" silly claims only show that theyve not undertsood the code and this would be clear when you, my friend, now go on to read the latest article "Intellgent people's guide to code-19" at http//19.org/?books (Parts 1-2 GOD Bless!
  • Muhammad's name

    28
    0 Votes
    28 Posts
    310 Views
    T
    edip yuksel wrote 3. A prophecy in the Bible containing a proper name would have had a self-defeating consequence. Imagine the first generation of supporters of Jesus who learned about that prophecy... "A prophet named Ahmad will come after me." Wouldn't all of them give the Arabic name Muhammad to their children, and grand children? If I were one of those lucky men, I would try hard to name my children and grandchildren to increase my chance of becoming the ancestor of the promised prophet. Wouldn't we have noticed a great number of Christians carrying such a name? i am not too sure about that...how many would have been his true followers? we can say assuredly that by the time muhammad came jesus had himself been turned into a god...so really does not translate into a great number of christians wanting to carry that name! infact the other way round..we can see from the verse that he was denied...so knowing about the prophecy there is a very good chance that they would have been on a search for an 'ahmad'....a bit like pharaoh perhaps...to try and finish him off as soon as they could...so maybe muslims back then would not have wanted the risk of calling their child 'ahmad' publicly! edip yuksel wrote Reflecting on these three points alone makes a case for Muhammad being a proper name made of a descriptive noun, and for ahmad being merely a descriptive adjective meaning "more praised." muhammad was clearly the name of the messenger...however what is the significance of jesus telling his followers that the name of the messenger who follows him will be "even more praised"? that said i do tend to think of ahmad as an allegory...though i do not rule out its being either an adjective or simply another name by which muhammad might have been known! another verse which really makes me wonder is 7157...this messenger has been written about in torah and gospel....would that be the same as saying he has been named therein? edip yuksel wrote PS A question for brother Ahmad Baghat who is so sure that Ahmad is a proper name If you want to say in Arabic, "A messenger will come after me whose name will be even more praised," how would you say it? how would this be written in arabic a messenger will come after me whose name will be ahmad!
  • Welcome to New Forum

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    38 Views
    W
    Congratulations for this new forum !
  • Moses

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    45 Views
    A
    Peace, Exodus,Leviticus, Deutenorium are manuscripts that has been put together from different manuscripts that were found in different schools around 500BC. The old story of Deutonorium that they found it in the temple, is an old fable. We have found at least 7 different manuscripts that were put together into this one manuscript, as also with Exodus and Leviticus. It is mixed hadith of Moses and the real laws that God gave to him. To say it is part the own made up law by Moses is not true. We don't know what laws specificaly were given to Moses, and which ones were ascribed to him later on. The only certainty we have is about the 10 commandments, and that there was a real exodus. The concept of the 5 books of Moses is false, we only have the story of the exodus that were later compiled into these three books, but these were written down centuries later, copied or not, they are not to be trusted to represent a trust worthy image of Moses words and ideas and the revelations given to him by God. The same is also for the words in the Gospels of Jesus and the Psalms which are also ascribed to David, but can all be traced back to certain collectors that put these stories later together. This cannot be compared with the Quran, which is written down immediately. So your assumption that we can use these theory of Moses's words, also with the Quran as being partly Muhammed's words, is false and non-scientific. These two cannot be compared, since your theory on Moses's laws is not correct. The three books are mixed history, legends and real revelations, were the real revelations were never meant to be mixed with human words. The original revelations are lost to us, and we have only bits and pieces that remain in the three books. And this mixing took place only after a period of a 1000 years, where by the original scriptures were destroyed, lost or hidden from the public. The original revelations were protected over a long period, till they decided to mix them with other manuscripts, and by thus destroying the message. This is not the case with the Quran, which was spread from its start in its original form, and has only small differences in letters between regions. Peace
  • Idolfree and all you should really watch this clip

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    43 Views
    U
    ASX files for Windows Media Player are wrappers, usually used as playlists, and are intended to contain links (http// or true streaming) to WMV movies on web servers which will they play automatically. However the format is rather dodgy and can be troublesome on windows platforms older than xp. If you dont have xp, try to get hold of a 3rd party player (asx player). Real one can do it, but you dont want that. trust me. It is a virus that can play videofiles on top of messing up your data, cause endless grief and dispair. Infact, the best function of real one is "uninstall" and even that isnt very good, as you have to manually delete all kinds of crap from your reg database after it anyway.
  • The Quran and the Prophet

    46
    0 Votes
    46 Posts
    748 Views
    U
    However you have the Quran, and you know its the last update. Howcome you dont read that then? I mean if you need to ask.... This is interesting, in what sense is it the last update and how have you confirmed this? merely by studying other ancient belief systems. I can see that it is pretty much the same storys, however. there is differences. BIG differences in how they are told, wich leads me to belive that this is a step up, from former versions. I admit, it can altso be a step down, this i am not able to verify.
  • Quran Pocket Size English Translation

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    40 Views
    U
    Sir Ahmed, I speak not of software but of that which consumes a tree, a pocket book! Good suggestion however, when/if I do get a cell phone I will be sure to dl this to that. peace! sorry mate, sounded a it dumb of me, lol well it is great software anyway and it does the salat reminder 5 times a day and according to sunrise and sunset, it can also recite in arabic with great reciter voice, it has plenty more, but a bit sunni though cheers
  • Women leadership and soldiership

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    62 Views
    U
    Peace In the Quran we have been given a couple of examples for women leaders we read in the Quran that Allah asked the wives of the prophet to abandon life and work for Him alone to propgate the religion after being taught to them first hand by the prophet, they also been ordered not to marry again after the prophet death and dedicate their lives to Allah and His religion, this is great honor for all muslim women indeed, the religion was taught to many men and women by women we also read about the Queen of sheba which I believe was a very just and strong leader (I heard that her mother was a Jinn, not sure actually) therefore there is no question that women can do what men do, and even from the history records, we have been informed about many women who fought wars in the cause of Allah Peace
  • Do we have to call ourselves Muslims?

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    119 Views
    T
    somewhere abraham says 'aslamto li rabbilalameen'! this rabbilalameen would perhaps be the god to whom the creation is meant to submit!