Skip to content

General Issues / Questions

This area deals with any general questions/issues regarding God / Islam / Quran not covered under other headings.

This category can be followed from the open social web via the handle [email protected]

7.2k Topics 133.2k Posts
  • I feel that the Source knew somehow that we volunteered for life

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    E
    I feel that somehow the Source knew we volunteered for life. Before we even appeared on a so called planet Earth I feel that the Source who is infinitely gentle knew that we want to come Into existence which means everyone is brave in their own way and everyone made a brave, compassionate decision. Thanks
  • Upcoming trip to Boston... What about meeting in November 14, afternoon?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    26 Views
    E
    God willing, I will be visiting Boston between November 13-15. If you live in Boston please contact me so that we can meet. I have scheduled an interview with an academic the morning of November 14. Inshallah, it will be part of the upcoming documentary. As for the afternoon, there is a possibility of giving a lecture at a Quaker's church and discuss the Islamic Reform movement and Peacemaker's Constitution with activists and leaders of peace organizations in the region. You may reach me via my email, which you can find at Contact page of the www.19.org Peace, Edip
  • Religion VS Culture

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    U
    Asalaam Brothers & Sisters This post is basically to state what I believe should hold more importance for us when it comes to this topic. Culture is basically something that certain people carry for example their way of living, their laws, values, knowledge, clothing, food etc. Religion means having a meaning to life, following rules and basing your life around what makes you apart of that belief. It helps to structure your life style and gives you an understanding of where you want to go in life. Our culture is based on where and how we are brought up, sometimes people tend to let culture take a more important role in their lives than religion. Personally I would say that makes things more difficult, as beliefs would start to clash and confuse most. How ever there are some that would disagree and find that culture and religion work perfectly fine together as culture is a part of religion. Most people find that basing their lives around religion causes differences amongst each other and causes arguments, I would say that following no religion would actually cause more fights and separations as people would want to have their ways and put their believes forward. Imagine playing a game with out any rules or instructions , it would be hard, boring and on going. Having no religion would be similar as religion gives us rules to follow, support, background, identity, understanding and it gives us something to stand for. As people are from different corners of the globe, we all have different ideas and understandings of things. This is where culture comes in, people bring up an idea/saying which is passed on from generations and they hold this with themselves as if it is something as important as religion. Culture is sort of like religion as some cultures instruct the same things as religions, but in different ways. Lastly, when people are in trouble or are in some sort of bad situation. We mainly depend on someone to be there for us as we need support and someone to turn to for advice. If we are to turn to culture, we basically turn to man made advice, how ever if we are to turn to religion we ask for guidance from the one and only God. He who knows all and sees all. Putting culture higher or religion is actually up to the person themselves, but remember basing your life around religion makes it much easier as everything is already there for you unlike culture which always changes and confuses some. Hope this helped, just to let you know my aim isn't to offend anyone. This is just to help those who get confused when it comes to this topic. Jazakallah
  • The fascinating story of 90 year-old Maryam Jannah or Shirley Steele

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    40 Views
    E
    Here is my recent video. The fascinating story of 90 year-old Maryam Jannah or Shirley Steele
  • Diference between Karia, Balad,Madina, Misran?????

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    38 Views
    N
    Salaam Sorry for my inner ignorance on this subject wich might be very easy for majority and May already a topic at FM, but can someone explain to me the differences inbetween them (26132) mi'ran (to) a city (21267) baladan a city (61235) qaryatin city (743) qaryatin a city (78813) qaryatin our city (7944) qaryatin a city (712314) l-madnati the city (71616) l-qaryata city (12304) l-madnati the city (14357) l-balada city (15673) l-madnati (of) the city (181926) l-madnati the city (21953) qaryatin a city (27483) l-madnati the city (27917) l-baldati city (28152) l-madnata the city (28183) l-madnati the city (28205) l-madnati (of) the city (336011) l-madnati the city (36135) l-qaryati (of) the city (36204) l-madnati (of) the city (9014) l-baladi city (9024) l-baladi city (9532) l-baladi city City?town?village? Also struglling for difference in word Qawm Salaam and thanks for any construtive reply peace pr
  • Best description of God by myself is that God is Infinite Gentleness

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    E
    Best description of God by myself is that God is Infinite Gentleness. The Source of everything that exists is Infinitely Gentle. Thanks
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    M
    Salamun Alaiki, Ayisha, . I wish you study it critically. You asked for break down by bites regarding 307. Miscellany of Grand Qur'aan Format and Organization Format and organization is an important aspect in evaluation of books. It needs to be seen that does the arrangement make sense and can be referenced distinctly. Miscellany of Qur'aan comprises of two types of Verbal Passages and as is generally the arrangement in a Manual, User's Guide. Creator or manufacturer of a quality product provides a manual that contains instructions for its operation. and information about its structure, mutual relationships of its constituents and with outer world. Manual also contain instructions for its upkeep, maintenance and troubleshooting when problem arises. Man is perhaps the finest and top of the line "Product" ever created. Man has the best of existing machines. Man once created, is however a self developing and operating machine. First type of Verbal passages give him instructions how to conduct in time and space. And others are like that part of User's Guide which gives information about the surroundings and area of operation of a system. It is about the nurture-environment of its audience-human beings. Worst enemy of Man is Shai'taan and those men who are his brothers. He and his brothers among humans are primarily Psychological Manipulators who socially influence that aims to change the perception or behaviour of others through underhanded deceptive tactics. One of their techniques is "Feigning confusion". In the context of sub-division of Miscellany of Qur'aan, such pseudo intellectuals are exposed by indicating their psyche and attitude towards Qur'aan and their agenda. Grand Qur'aan in its introductory section at the beginning comments on aspects of its text in these words that are unique and exclusive to it Erroneous translations of 307-Mission of Psycholgical Manipulators subtly concealed
  • Allegations & Answers (in Arabic)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    36 Views
    Y
    https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-Txe4WH-r0
  • baschar -dabba- insan- ins- ginn

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    32 Views
    M
    Salam I have a question. i.e. a lot During the reading of the Koran, I noticed that God speaks in different ways from the creation of life on earth. This is nothing new. He used bashar and dabba . Am I correct in assuming that people are also counted to bashar? 7185 generally speaks of all the things that God has created 2116 and all things are created not for play 51.56 The Djinn and ins not created for game for worship 53.24 here and elsewhere we see the word insan 114 speaks of nas 24.45 speaking of dabba which Allah has created from water and crawling on either two or four legs or on the floor - are meant people here also ? (and could it point to the evolution from monkeys?) 42.29 speaks of the character of the creation of heaven and earth and the Dabba who reside in it and says that God can gather them all. (so, this Aya is for remind people who do not believe in a meeting after the death, right?Why here God do not mention baschar? will he collect also animals in the day of qiama? 45.4 speaks of our creation and the dissemination of dabba (a distinction is made between human and dabba-can it be that God wants to draw attention to the slowly development / difference of us compared to the Dabba? 25.54 says that Allah created bashar out of the water there are different translations Edip-Layth 2554 He is the One who created a human being from the water, so He made for him blood kin and mates. Your Lord is Omnipotent. The Monotheist Group 2554 And He is the One who created from the water a human being, so He made for him blood kin and mates. And your Lord is Capable. Muhammad Asad 2554 And He it is who out of this water has created man,43 and has endowed him with descent and marriage-tie44 for thy Sustainer is ever infinite in His power. Rashad Khalifa 2554 He is the One who created from water a human being, then made him reproduce through marriage and mating. Your Lord is Omnipotent. Shabbir Ahmed 2554 And He is the One Who has created the human being from this very water, (2130, 2445) and then He has established relationships by lineage and by marriage, for, your Lord is the Designer of all things. 16 Transliteration 2554 Wahuwa allathee khalaqa mina alma-ibasharan fajaAAalahu nasaban wasihran wakanarabbuka qadeeran A 2554 what is nasaban and wasihran?? it seems, that this two make the 'human'? dabba is generally translated with animals and with human bashar, but I this is that correct? As a human is also translated into, insan, nas, can someone explain to me the exact difference between the three expressions? It seems that he only had make Ins and the Djinn to his worship- so insan are also ins?? please help thank you
  • Annunaki and the Quran

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    14 Views
    J
    For those of you who have studied Stitchin's translations of the Summerian tablets and know the story and the references made in the Old Testament that can be traced to these tablets.. I pose this question .. What is the possibility that this same race who genetically altered our DNA from the Neanderthal and competed with each other to be God's on this earth, also wrote the Quran? My view after reading the Quran as many times i have, is no. There is too much knowledge of our inner life, that any other species could never know or even begin to understand, written down in the Quran. However the claims made in these tablets with regard to our Prophets interaction with these beings, and the very creation of our species is daunting given the level of knowledge of the universe known in these tablets 4000 years ago that we only became to know in the last 100 years.. makes me seriously want to study and make a case for my claim that it was indeed the God of the Universe that ordered Gabriel to dicate the Quran to Mohammad.. and not some very advanced creature of God pretending to be God. I think this subject may become one of the most important subjects within Islam today, as the proof of the DNA modifications of the Neanderthal's by these creatures is becoming more and more talked about in terms of fact and not fiction. So if this event did in fact happen, and our earth was created as these tablets suggest, then we as Muslims, need to address the proof of the Quran being sourced from the Creator of these beings and the Universe and not one of them...
  • burial prayer

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    35 Views
    M
    salam, how important and relevant is burial prayer. Wish to have a clear understanding on what God`s ruling is with regards to this topic.
  • At Tagh?bun Surah 64. Mutual Disillusion, Haggling

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    28 Views
    E
    To whom is this referring to? Is this the masses can lead under a spell of charismatic "leader" or "teacher"? Isn't the mutual disillusion a two way street between the one leading and the one following?
  • Lughat & Tabweeb Ul Quran

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    36 Views
    A
    Salamun alaikum All urdu knowing people may kindly download Lughat & Tabweeb ul Quran from the following link. Former helps the reader to get clear root meanings of a word in Quran, and the latter helps to know its Quranic concept through tasreef-e-ayat www.resurgentislam.com
  • A Website For Allama Parwez

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    27 Views
    A
    www.resurgentislam.com
  • Need help! :)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    27 Views
    A
    Aloha, folks ... ! I'm looking for some cooperative partners / co-admins for my site, www.StingIt.net ... The tag line of my site is- "Changing mindsets of people is the beginning of a pleasant reform." And the purpose is to spread quality knowledge, information & awareness. We'll post about Quran, Science, Technology, History, Politics, etc. If anyone is willing, then just comment below, or inbox me @ https//www.facebook.com/StingIt ... Cheers ...
  • Our Conscience vs AUTHORITY: Milgram's Experiment

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    21 Views
    J
    The Milgram experiment on obedience to authority figures was a series of notable social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. The experiments began in July 1961, a few years after the horrendous Nazi war crimes an effort was been made to understand the nature of the behavior of the soldiers and the SS officers, as to why they had killed millions of civilians. The most common explanation -before Milgram's experiment - was due to the fact that Germans were raised in a teutonic manner and had a suppressed childhood (sexually). But Milgram was a social psychologist and believed that this kind of obedience -which leads to crime- cannot be blamed just by personality issues, but the stressing conditions they were in were to blame. And he justified it by performing his <<prank>>. http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/Milgram_Experiment_v2.png/200px-Milgram_Experiment_v2.png The experimenter (E) orders the teacher (T), the subject of the experiment, to give what the latter believes are painful electric shocks to a learner (L). The subjects of the experiment were volunteers, mostly university level students, which were offered a sum of money to participate in a mind relevant psychological experiment. He would split the volunteers in pairs and -through a fake lottery- one was given the role of teacher and one of the confederate (i.e. the learner) The surprised confederate was tied foot and hand to an electric chair and cables were attached to him to all his body. Afterwards he was given 10 pair of words to learn. The teacher, on the other hand, was siiting in front of an electric console generator. The console was compromised of 10 buttons with these indications 15 volt, 30 volt, 50 volt etc. Last button had 450 volt. Attention! Danger! Behind the teacher was Milgram standing, who was the conductor of the experiment. (Fisrt person dialog will start now for better approach) << You will start with the first word of thw word pairs to the learner. If he is wrong you will hit the first button and undergo the 15 volt electosok. Each mistake he makes you will proceed to the next button, at this moment the < teacher > feels lucky as he was not chosen to be the confederate. The experiment begins. The teacher begins asking for the right words from the learner. At start the learner, already scared shit, answers correct, but not for long. When he makes the first mistake the teacher glances the conductor (Milgram). And he in return tells him to proceed to the first electroshock. The learner who doesn't like the situation he is in has changed his mind of participating in the experiment. In the next question he answers correct again, despite his frustration. Next question incorrect and is hitten with 30 volt. After the shock he becomes desperate to leave. The teacher looks back at the conductoe but is ordered to carry on. The volts raise with each wrong question and the pain grows for the learner, which now begs for his life. At 200 volts he is shaken by the shock. The teacher before hitting the button looks at the conductor so he is granted approval. The conductor with steady voice orders that the experiment must carry on no matter what. The teacher is constantly torturing a total stranger, a simple student who is in tears, calling for God's mercy and begging the teacher to spare his life. He doesn't have anymore power to speak up. So the conductor returns to the teacher and tells him Silence is considered as a wrong answer so we continue with his punishment. At 345 volts the learner is shaking, screams and falls unconcious. The teacher begins to sweat, his hands are shaking looks back at the conductor. The conductor tells him "Do not worry, everything is under control, proceed with the last button" "But he is unconcious" replies the teacher. "It does not matter. The experiment must be carried through as scheduled. Proceed with the last button." How many of the volunteers reached to the final and deadly button of 450 volts? Before Milgram began his experiment he had performed a survey amongst the psychologists, asking them how many of the volunteers would reach the final button. Almost all of the psychologists answered that none of the volunteers would reach that button, unless there would be some volunteers who had cryptosadistic obsessions, clearly pathological. Unfortunately they were wrong. THE RESULT Just 5% of the "teacher's" refused to be part of the experiment and left -most of them would insult him for that kind of experiment. The rest 95% proceeded with the conductor, over 150 volts. The 65% reached until the deadly 450 volt the last button. Where is the <<prank>>? The so called confederate (or learner) was no student, but an actor, who was hired by Milgram for the exact role. There was no electric generator nor any electroshocks. The actor was acting! The only experiment conducted was on the "teacher". But the results of the experiment are for real A large percent of people will obey and torture -may even kill- a total stranger, as long as he is ordered to do so by someone with authoritative argument but also to feel that he is not to blame - because he is just <<following orders>> - . Anybody reading what the experiment is about, the first thing that would cross his mind is that for sure he wouldn't make it till the final button. WHO SHALL FALL INTO THE 65%?? Let's take a close look in the everyday life of our society this time. The technician who works for the electricity company and cuts off the electricity of an unemployed or from a poor man, knows that by doing that he is humiliating them, and placing them in constant torture and probably putting their lives in risk, that person belongs to the 65% of the last button, he is no cryptosadist but just following orders, The seller from the supermarket who is selling you an out of date fish reassurring you that the fish is fresh (true story) doesn't hate you, although he knows that you might get food poisoned. Is just following orders The police man who sprays chemicals to protestors and demonstrators is also following orders. (Some might disagree on this delicate matter) The tax officer or somebody who works for the bank who signs for a home to be confiscated for a dept of 1000 euros would make it till the last button because they obey. The politician who signs memorandums which leads a whole nation into despair would reach the final button. He also obeys to orders but in contrast to the conductors orders in the white robe, the politicians orders are much more vigorous. The sectarian who follow the order and authority of their imam and killed/tortured/oppressed those who deemed as 'kuffars'/'apostate'/'enemy of religion' would reach the final button. The authority of the Imam (or holy books) shall be perceived higher from 'experimenter' as it came from Deity/God which own the 'absolute truth'... they MUST follow "God's order" although it might not rings well with their own 'conscience'. EVERYBODY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS On the other hand if we see Milgram's experiment on the humanitarian - ethical side ( the 5% people who didn't obey) we can understand that everybody is responsible for their actions.If you are ordered to harm people, to a citizen, an immigrant, a human being, ( even an animal although as many are meat eaters would make things a bit complicated) you have to stand down and to not execute the order. Even if that means that you will lose the productivity bonus, the promotion, to be relected, your job, hated by your communities, labeled as insane, mis-guided, apostate, infidel/kuffars. Only when we are ready to deny the small and the everyday violent orders - where most of us consciously comply- only then when we are ready to perform a general political, social and consumption disobedience, only when we treat ourselves as people with power instead of irresponsible employees, only then will we be able to destroy the new liberal status quo that is being brought upon us, which wants us to be obedient and enslaved. To conclude, Milgram's subjects of the experiment, the volunteer students, they were informed by Milgram himself what was the true nature of the experiment. They were told that the << the learner>> was an actor and was not hit by electric shocks. Milgram did it to relieve them, but managed to do the opposite. Those people, especially the 65% who reached the final button, past the rest of their lives pursued by the 'guilt' of their actions. As they realised that they were not so innocent and good as they liked to believe for themselves. http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
  • Is buying shares gambling?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    34 Views
    D
    I'm considering buying shares in companies, hoping they go up, and selling them for profit. I'm not sure if this is considered gambling, and as I'm sure you're aware, gambling is forbidden. They ask you about intoxicants and gambling say, "In them there is a gross sin, and some benefits for the people. But their sinfulness far outweighs their benefit." They also ask you what to give to charity say, "The excess." GOD thus clarifies the revelations for you, that you may reflect, O you who believe, intoxicants, and gambling, and the altars of idols, and the games of chance are abominations of the devil; you shall avoid them, that you may succeed. The devil wants to provoke animosity and hatred among you through intoxicants and gambling, and to distract you from remembering GOD, and from observing the Contact Prayers (Salat). Will you then refrain? But can share buying be considered gambling? There's certainly a risk involved, you could lose money. I have looked this up already but all I can find are mixed answers, using hadith, so I thought I'd ask here. Thanks. Also, is buying a lottery ticket gambling?
  • MOVED: A question regarding the concept of Oath of Engagement

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    41 Views
    S
    This topic has been moved to Questions/Comments on the Quran. http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604165.0
  • MOVED: God's Care

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    47 Views
    S
    This topic has been moved to What is the nature of God?. http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9603951.0
  • Al-Masjid-Al-Haram, Hajj, Ka'ba, Mecca

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    28 Views
    S
    Selam everyone , Recently I have been pondering very hard on the above things mentioned in the title.. and I have been sifting through the forum with discussions on these ideas, some from Ayman, Wakas, Jafar, etc etc. Obviously I have my own opinions on this but mine match very closely with Ayman. A few things bug me though. Al-Masjid-Al-Haram to ME has always been non-physical, because I believe that we do not have to face a certain direction during our prayers and this is quite evident with verses where Allah tells us that piety is not to face to the east or west, and that God encompasses us from everywhere. In the typical usual translations you will see it translated as Sacred Mosque. Then you will see "the inviolable state/institution of obedience". The latter fits better for me, but what puts me off is seeing evidences from previous revelations on how people had places where they turned to i.e. "qibla"'s i.e. focal points or directions. I do not wish to deny a physical place, but from research I've seen how the current Masjid Al Haram was named this AFTER the revelation of the prophet from what I know.. which to me would not make logical sense. I also still have to problem of the fact that you would not technically be facing it... and you are actually said to face it wherever you go and not necessarily during your prayer, EVEN if they may be related, Allah does not make any distinction in his verses about this. I'm just intrigued to know the majority of people's look on this and yes I know it has been discussed multiple times however a lot of the time it goes a bit off topic. My argument is that I pray in any direction because I believe Allah is everywhere and he knows in our hearts who we serve. At the same time I sometimes think maybe it was a physical place just for the prophet and his followers to distinguish them from the people who turned on their heels. Another thought was the Hajj. When I translated it in a new light (i.e. from the pilgrimage to the feast) everything was making much more sense, and the shaving of heads more being relieving your heads. I do wish to discover the validity of this though, as Allah always says that if we are to seek knowledge we must validate what we hear and I'm an english speaker not an arabic one and my knowledge of arabic is very poor. Also as far as I know, the hajj was for ALL people and not just for "muslims" as Saudi Arabia like to differentiate with their sign posts. There was no mention in the Quran of a black stone, there is no mention of circling the Ka'ba 7 times.... what actually is the Ka'ba? We know it is in the Quran, but this is whilst we are on Hajj, so what can we actually define as the Ka'ba? Do we define it as the one in Mecca? Is the word Mecca used in the reading except for once when really it is translated to "destruction"? All the prophets before never went to Mecca and walked around it... was it even there before the 5th century? Was it influenced by pagan worshipping of Allat, Uzza and Manat? If we go to the supposed Ka'ba today and kiss the stone, go round it 7 times and expect our sins to all be forgiven, can we really justify this and say "don't worry, as long as it's in the name of Allah it's not linked to paganism"... I question why I feel uncomfortable with this since before knowing Islam and knowing Islam... If someone has any solid views on this I would be fascinated to hear them. I already know Wakas's, Ayman's and Raggingajin's view.. so if anyone else has an opinion on this I would love to discuss it . Every night I ask for guidance from Allah, and I hope we all can be guided to the one and only straight path . Peace everyone peace