Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Does it say that Adam was the first man in the Quran?

Does it say that Adam was the first man in the Quran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
52 Posts 18 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    vivek
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    ...Adam ?one causes blood to flow.(231)

    David did that and so did Moses, and the Jews tried to do that to Jesus not sure if they where successful.

    peace

    Peace Simple,

    Didn't Muhammad do that(causing blood to flow)? If not, what about that wars he waged even for defending Islam or protecting his/followers' life?

    Yours truly,

    K.Vivekanandan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Offline
      P Offline
      Prince
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      The address is to the plural audience "you".

      To nerspi With it being plural how have you derived to the conclusion that each of us has a soul mate and is created from a single soul using quranic verses ??? Just curious.

      PEACE

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        nerspi
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        7189, 396 can be looked that way,
        don't think it makes much of a difference if it's plural or singular. goes both ways.
        but how i derived at it is another story altogether. quran encourages us to explore nature, world... knowledge is everywhere, it's not compressed in 1 book, it has all we need for guidence but it also points elsewhere, not at itself.

        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597535.msg188417#msg188417

        http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IDPhaPqVkk
        http//www.nderf.org/consciousness.htm
        "Soulmates is a necessary component of soul development. NDErs identified the most important principals as 1) that everything and everyone is connected; 2) recognition that the other side is home; 3) unconditional love; 4) support from both sides of the veil for our soul development; 5) lessons on reconnection; and 6) that Soulmates is one aspect of individuals feeling connected to a supreme creative being. These principals were derived from the most commonly reported elements concerning relationships. Questions reviewed were those asking about encounters with beings (familiar and unfamiliar), comments about relationships, emotions, feelings, interconnectedness, and universal purpose or order."
        http//www.ascension-research.org/twin_flames.html

        i know most (if not all) of the research is of spiritual nature, through nde, or obe... it's still valid. i read quite a lot on it to understand it better, plus it really doesn't say anything against qran, in fact it makes me look at 7189 in that light.
        yes it can be refering to formation of a physical body as well, yet it couldbe bother, that + soul creation... i don't see why God would focus so much on this physical being when it's almost unimportant, compared to a soul, it vanishes with time, but soul is here forever. it's the soul that's important, it's the soul that drives this body.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          herbman
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          It is.

          Except here

          7189
          It is He Who created you from a single soul, and created her mate from it , in order that he might dwell with her (in love). When he had sexual contact with her, she bears a light burden and carries it about (unnoticed). When she grows heavy, they both pray to Allah their Lord, (saying) "If Thou givest us a goodly child, we vow we shall (ever) be grateful.
          The underlined pronouns are gendered, because they are linked to the last underlined (she), who bears the child!
          The original Arabic version

          This is a proof that Adam was either a couple, at least, or a female ;D

          Salam Samia,

          I don't understand why you say "This is a proof that Adam was either a couple, at least, or a female ", I didn't get it!!!!
          nafs is feminine isn't it?
          I understand both (Adam and his spouse) are from the same nafs.
          It is He Who created you from a single soul, and created her mate from it (nafs)....

          please share and get patient angel

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            herbman
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            also in the same idea

            711
            It is We who created you and gave you shape; then We bade the angels prostrate to Adam, and they prostrated, not so Iblis; he refused to be of those who bow down.

            you= plural

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              nimnimak_11
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              Adam was preceded by "bashar". There's a big difference between bashar and insaan, even in our anguage today. God brethed into the bashar and the insaan (adam) ws the result

              3871

              When thy Lord said unto the angels Lo! I am about to create a mortal out of mire,
              3872

              And when I have fashioned him and breathed into him of My Spirit, then fall down before him prostrate,

              The non specialized English language does not have an equivalent to the word "bashar". Both bashar and insaan is "human" in English.
              Adam is none but us
              711

              And We created you, then fashioned you, then told the angels Fall ye prostrate before Adam! And they fell prostrate, all save Iblis, who was not of those who make prostration.

              Very interesting. Thanks!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat3_files/3_33.gif
                Surely Allah chose Adam and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.

                so who is that Adam in the above verse? Adam of the Eve or a different Adam?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jack
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  Adam = mankind is a symbolic interpretation, because of 711.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    Adam = mankind is a symbolic interpretation, because of 711.

                    yes, that makes more sense

                    Surely Allah chose mankind and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.

                    ???

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jack
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Nice try ;D Wouldn't hurt you to be serious, every once in a while.

                      A symbolic interpretation is not equivalent to a literal translation. Try taking 218 or 639 literally, for example.

                      Adam, literally, refers to one "person".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        A symbolic interpretation is not equivalent to a literal translation. Try taking 218 or 639 literally, for example.

                        Adam, literally, refers to one "person".

                        lets see

                        adam = humanity

                        test1

                        http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat7_files/7_11.gif
                        We created you, then we shaped you, then we said to the angels, "Fall prostrate before humanity." They fell prostrate, except Iblees (Satan); he was not with the prostrators.

                        result yes

                        test2

                        http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat19_files/19_58.gif
                        These are some of the prophets whom GOD blessed. They were chosen from among the descendants of humanity, and the descendants of those whom we carried with Noah, and the descendants of Abraham and Israel, and from among those whom we guided and selected. When the revelations of the Most Gracious are recited to them, they fall prostrate, weeping.

                        result nope

                        conclusion

                        Adam = humanity
                        Adam = name of a person

                        context is the key.

                        thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jack
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          lets see

                          adam = humanity

                          test1

                          http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat7_files/7_11.gif
                          We created you, then we shaped you, then we said to the angels, "Fall prostrate before humanity." They fell prostrate, except Iblees (Satan); he was not with the prostrators.

                          result yes

                          test2

                          http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat19_files/19_58.gif
                          These are some of the prophets whom GOD blessed. They were chosen from among the descendants of humanity, and the descendants of those whom we carried with Noah, and the descendants of Abraham and Israel, and from among those whom we guided and selected. When the revelations of the Most Gracious are recited to them, they fall prostrate, weeping.

                          result nope

                          conclusion

                          Adam = humanity
                          Adam = name of a person

                          context is the key.

                          thanks

                          Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

                          You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

                          What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            afridi220
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

                            You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

                            What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

                            RS is right we are not Adam we are Ben Adam not Bin Laden ;D

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

                              yes

                              You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

                              What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

                              follow the best.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                palestina
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                3871

                                1528

                                2554

                                This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                                3020

                                This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                                The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                                518
                                ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                                1533
                                Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  afridi220
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  3871

                                  1528

                                  2554

                                  This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                                  3020

                                  This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                                  The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                                  518
                                  ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                                  1533
                                  Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                                  Hmmm you mean aliens were created before us that are why they are advance in technology. hmm

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    palestina
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      afridi220
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                                      No way mam nope do you have any proof may be dont work here ;D

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                                        we were but one community, then we became aliens to each other as per 1019

                                        Adam = humanity as per 711

                                        Adam = one man as per 333, 1958

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jack
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          3871

                                          1528

                                          2554

                                          This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                                          3020

                                          This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                                          The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                                          518
                                          ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                                          1533
                                          Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                                          This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                                          Good thinking. If you read the verses after 230, the malaika say that they only know what God has taught them!

                                          3020

                                          This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                                          The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                                          Evolution? Thumma, in my opinion, implies a period of time. 7117 also talks about our creation.

                                          Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                                          Quiet possible, imo. Or that we existed before the creation of adam. This could be how the malaika knew our behavior.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users