Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Does it say that Adam was the first man in the Quran?

Does it say that Adam was the first man in the Quran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
52 Posts 18 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Adam = mankind is a symbolic interpretation, because of 711.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #41

      Adam = mankind is a symbolic interpretation, because of 711.

      yes, that makes more sense

      Surely Allah chose mankind and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.

      ???

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jack
        wrote on last edited by
        #42

        Nice try ;D Wouldn't hurt you to be serious, every once in a while.

        A symbolic interpretation is not equivalent to a literal translation. Try taking 218 or 639 literally, for example.

        Adam, literally, refers to one "person".

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #43

          A symbolic interpretation is not equivalent to a literal translation. Try taking 218 or 639 literally, for example.

          Adam, literally, refers to one "person".

          lets see

          adam = humanity

          test1

          http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat7_files/7_11.gif
          We created you, then we shaped you, then we said to the angels, "Fall prostrate before humanity." They fell prostrate, except Iblees (Satan); he was not with the prostrators.

          result yes

          test2

          http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat19_files/19_58.gif
          These are some of the prophets whom GOD blessed. They were chosen from among the descendants of humanity, and the descendants of those whom we carried with Noah, and the descendants of Abraham and Israel, and from among those whom we guided and selected. When the revelations of the Most Gracious are recited to them, they fall prostrate, weeping.

          result nope

          conclusion

          Adam = humanity
          Adam = name of a person

          context is the key.

          thanks

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            Jack
            wrote on last edited by
            #44

            lets see

            adam = humanity

            test1

            http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat7_files/7_11.gif
            We created you, then we shaped you, then we said to the angels, "Fall prostrate before humanity." They fell prostrate, except Iblees (Satan); he was not with the prostrators.

            result yes

            test2

            http//www.submission.org/efarsi/arabic/Surat19_files/19_58.gif
            These are some of the prophets whom GOD blessed. They were chosen from among the descendants of humanity, and the descendants of those whom we carried with Noah, and the descendants of Abraham and Israel, and from among those whom we guided and selected. When the revelations of the Most Gracious are recited to them, they fall prostrate, weeping.

            result nope

            conclusion

            Adam = humanity
            Adam = name of a person

            context is the key.

            thanks

            Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

            You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

            What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              afridi220
              wrote on last edited by
              #45

              Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

              You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

              What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

              RS is right we are not Adam we are Ben Adam not Bin Laden ;D

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #46

                Are you saying there are 2 different adams? One referring to humanity, the other to one person?

                yes

                You are translating it in one verse, and not in another? This is guess work.

                What about instances where it could mean BOTH a proper noun, or humanity. 359. What's your criteria for choosing one over the other?

                follow the best.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  palestina
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #47

                  3871

                  1528

                  2554

                  This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                  3020

                  This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                  The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                  518
                  ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                  1533
                  Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    afridi220
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #48

                    3871

                    1528

                    2554

                    This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                    3020

                    This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                    The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                    518
                    ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                    1533
                    Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                    Hmmm you mean aliens were created before us that are why they are advance in technology. hmm

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      palestina
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #49

                      Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        afridi220
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #50

                        Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                        No way mam nope do you have any proof may be dont work here ;D

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #51

                          Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                          we were but one community, then we became aliens to each other as per 1019

                          Adam = humanity as per 711

                          Adam = one man as per 333, 1958

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jack
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #52

                            3871

                            1528

                            2554

                            This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                            3020

                            This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                            The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                            518
                            ...You are merely "bashar" from what He has created... where there other "bashar" created?

                            1533
                            Could there have been other "bashar" made out of material other than "hardened clay of aged mud"?

                            This verse (230) gives a clue... the reaction of the "malaika" may be indicating that they have seen some form of "bashar" before - which they based their statement on?

                            Good thinking. If you read the verses after 230, the malaika say that they only know what God has taught them!

                            3020

                            This verse says that God created you out of dust - then you became "bashar" spreading out.
                            The "thumma" here is interesting... What do you make of it?

                            Evolution? Thumma, in my opinion, implies a period of time. 7117 also talks about our creation.

                            Well I dont know where you got "aliens" from.... but maybe other "bashar" were those who came before homo sapiens? and adam and eve were the first homo sapiens?

                            Quiet possible, imo. Or that we existed before the creation of adam. This could be how the malaika knew our behavior.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users