Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Hafs or Warsh

Hafs or Warsh

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
99 Posts 7 Posters 3.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    contradict what God says about the preservation of the Qur'an

    peace, see oldest manuscripts l-amthla/the examples (no extra alif) same word

    1317 l-amthla/the examples
    1425 l-amthla/the examples
    1445 l-amthla/the examples
    1674 l-amthla/the examples
    1748 l-amthla/the examples
    259 l-amthla/the examples
    2435 l-amthla/the examples
    2539 l-amthla/the examples
    2943 l-amthlu/the examples
    5921 l-amthlu/the examples

    these are different (no extra alif)

    3182 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
    4153 biul'mihim/in wrong/injustice theirs
    4160 fabiul'min/so in wrong/injustice
    682 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
    6131 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
    11117 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
    1661 biul'mihim/in wrong/injustice theirs
    2225 biul'min/in wrong/injustice

    (with extra alif)
    851 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
    2210 such in what have set forth hands your and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
    4146 who work righteous of so for soul his/himself and who does evil so against it and not lord your biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
    5029 not changed the speech with me and not I am biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?

    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/182/handschrift/163

    https//i.postimg.cc/2StcgFjV/ch3v175-183.jpg

    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/51/handschrift/163

    https//i.postimg.cc/Nfv8ZCwy/ch8v48-59.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      imrankhawaja
      wrote on last edited by
      #80

      Peace Imran.
      I have cited the verses for you. I have given you my take on it .
      I have asked your take on it?
      GOD bless you.
      Peace.

      peace Gl

      only problem is you never understand the questions.

      even i asked here something else ?
      i asked where is the evidence that God decided to write in such a way to hinting towards numbering ? did he personally told you or just ur wishfulthinking ?

      if God claimed it he must claimed in clear cut way ? did U GET it what i am asking

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        good_logic
        wrote on last edited by
        #81

        Peace Imran.
        I have seen this, quote
        i asked where is the evidence that God decided to write in such a way to hinting towards numbering ? did he personally told you or just ur wishfulthinking ?

        "...Ahsa Kulla Chaiin Addadan".. i.e GOD counted the numbers ..
        I repeat
        Brother Imran, I think the above should be enough,but let me elaborate more on 2187

        Why do I think this verse is indicating to us how to spell the letter N in 681?
        There are 14 different initial letters used in Qoran, this verse is screaming N the initial (The only one in 681) also is spelt like the N in this verse. Count how many N s in it?
        Yes brother GOD has put exactly 14 N s in that verse as indication. Or it is coincidence to you?
        GOD bless you.
        Peace.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          ibn_a
          wrote on last edited by
          #82

          Salaam,

          peace, see oldest manuscripts l-amthla/the examples (no extra alif) same word

          1317 l-amthla/the examples
          1425 l-amthla/the examples
          1445 l-amthla/the examples
          1674 l-amthla/the examples
          1748 l-amthla/the examples
          259 l-amthla/the examples
          2435 l-amthla/the examples
          2539 l-amthla/the examples
          2943 l-amthlu/the examples
          5921 l-amthlu/the examples

          these are different (no extra alif)

          3182 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
          4153 biul'mihim/in wrong/injustice theirs
          4160 fabiul'min/so in wrong/injustice
          682 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
          6131 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
          11117 biul'min/in wrong/injustice
          1661 biul'mihim/in wrong/injustice theirs
          2225 biul'min/in wrong/injustice

          (with extra alif)
          851 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
          2210 such in what have set forth hands your and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
          4146 who work righteous of so for soul his/himself and who does evil so against it and not lord your biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?
          5029 not changed the speech with me and not I am biallmin/in darkness to the devotees?

          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/182/handschrift/163

          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/51/handschrift/163

          What is your theory, understanding on these differences?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            imrankhawaja
            wrote on last edited by
            #83

            Why do I think this verse is indicating to us how to spell the letter N in 681?
            There are 14 different initial letters used in Qoran, this verse is screaming N the initial (The only one in 681) also is spelt like the N in this verse. Count how many N s in it?
            Yes brother GOD has put exactly 14 N s in that verse as indication.

            so your thinking has nothing to do with God decision isnt it ? the answer you gave is just your thinking not the reality.

            BOLD so what ?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              good_logic
              wrote on last edited by
              #84

              Peace Imran.
              Like I said to you. Accountability dictates that each of us check for themselves.
              If you are happy with your lot(Your old manuscripts) ,it is your choice.
              I am happy with mine(after checking for myself the mathematical structure).

              As for the message, it is crystal clear in both our mushafs . So I wish you the best of works/morals brother.
              This is the most important thing in Qoran.(Inna Akramakum inda Allah Atkaakum)
              GOD bless you.
              Peace.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Noon_waalqalami
                wrote on last edited by
                #85

                Peace, last post need to take a break...

                2187

                Why do I think this verse is indicating to us how to spell the letter N in 681?
                There are 14 different initial letters used in Qoran, this verse is screaming N the initial

                681 noon wal-qalami/and the pen and what yasurna/they write being (i.e. writing)

                Furthermore, does not spell N (noon) rather parse the word ?

                2187 l-nuni/the noon being

                the
                N (noon)
                being (i.e. so-called)

                Likewise, see example ?

                4917 yamunnna/favored being ... yamunnu/favored

                What is your theory, understanding on these differences?

                Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                482 do so not they reflecting the qur?an/recitation and in case be from near/with other than the god surely found they of in it ikhtilafan/divergences of (single occurrence) kathiran/much of (3+)

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/50/vers/29?handschrift=163

                https//i.postimg.cc/nL6Rn8s7/ch50v14-34.jpg

                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/50/vers/29?handschrift=32

                https//i.postimg.cc/0j9CN996/ch50v26-43.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Offline
                  G Offline
                  good_logic
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #86

                  Peace Noon.
                  Common brother, the "being" word is made up here i
                  2187 l-nuni/the noon being

                  the
                  N (noon)
                  being (i.e. so-called)

                  So-called what? There is no word "being" in the verse. The word in the verse just means the letter N .
                  There is no relation to 4917 yamunnna/favored being ... yamunnu/favoured.

                  Enjoy your break brother.
                  GOD bless you.
                  Peace.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    ibn_a
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #87

                    Salaam,

                    Peace, last post need to take a break...

                    Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                    482 do so not they reflecting the qur?an/recitation and in case be from near/with other than the god surely found they of in it ikhtilafan/divergences of (single occurrence) kathiran/much of (3+)

                    When you have time, please share what you consider as consistent "oldest manuscripts" that you are referring to.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #88

                      When you have time, please share what you consider as consistent "oldest manuscripts" that you are referring to.

                      Peace gave numerous examples including ten consistently spelled not half spelled (same word).

                      1. 1317 the examples

                      2. 1425 the examples

                      3. 1445 the examples

                      4. 1674 the examples

                      5. 1748 the examples

                      6. 259 the examples

                      7. 2435 the examples

                      8. 2539 the examples

                      9. 2943 the examples

                      10. 5921 the examples

                      1317 l-amthla/the examples
                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/13/vers/17?handschrift=13
                      https//i.postimg.cc/j2r4kf5J/ch13v12-v23.jpg

                      1674 l-amthla/the examples
                      UNESCO ?Memory of the World? Program ?San?a Manuscripts CD First AH 1673-89
                      https//i.postimg.cc/SQCBN0Bm/ch16v73-89.jpg

                      1748 l-amthla/the examples
                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/49?handschrift=107
                      https//i.postimg.cc/YqZJ2nh6/ch17v46-56.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        ibn_a
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #89

                        Salaam,

                        peace gl, your infatuation with nineteen is making you lose sense of basic logic.
                        it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                        NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

                        1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
                        1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
                        1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

                        These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

                        259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
                        2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                        2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
                        2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
                        5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

                        Some examples of differences in the spelling of words from what you call " consistent oldest manuscripts".

                        Example

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/218/handschrift/163
                        line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/56/handschrift/163
                        line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/73/handschrift/163
                        line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/50?handschrift=107
                        line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        -- Compare to

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/107?handschrift=163
                        line 21 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/53?handschrift=163
                        line 23-24 - Mercy / Grace of God

                        Example

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/38?handschrift=163
                        line 20-21 - Way (of) the former (people)

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/35/vers/43?handschrift=163
                        line 19-20 - Way (of) the former (people)

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/85?handschrift=163
                        line 19-20 ( the) Way (of) Allah

                        -- Compare to

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/13?handschrift=163
                        line 9 - Way (of) the former (people)

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/18/vers/55?handschrift=163
                        line 3 - Way (of) the former (people)

                        https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/33/vers/38?handschrift=107
                        last line ( the) Way (of) Allah


                        I think that the particular spelling of some words in the Quran we have today is not inconsistent, it is for a purpose and in time the purpose will be revealed by God.

                        Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                        There is no logique in saying that the scribes changed the spelling of the word Ibraheem only in chapter 2 and not in the rest of the Quran, they must have had a source for these particular spellings.

                        Cautious when saying "inconsistent" about the current manuscript especially when in condradiction with Quran veses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #90

                          Some examples of differences in the spelling of words from what you call " consistent oldest manuscripts".

                          Example

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/218/handschrift/163
                          line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/56/handschrift/163
                          line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/73/handschrift/163
                          line 3 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/50?handschrift=107
                          line 9 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          -- Compare to

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/107?handschrift=163
                          line 21 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/53?handschrift=163
                          line 23-24 - Mercy / Grace of God

                          peace, same in ?new? manuscripts slight distinction verb & verbal noun from root raima/mercy

                          3938 ? biramatin/in mercy its shall they with-holders ramatihi/mercy his ?

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/39/vers/38/handschrift/163

                          https//i.postimg.cc/ZKkw3BwB/ch39v33-44.jpg

                          Example

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/8/vers/38?handschrift=163
                          line 20-21 - Way (of) the former (people)

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/35/vers/43?handschrift=163
                          line 19-20 - Way (of) the former (people)

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/85?handschrift=163
                          line 19-20 ( the) Way (of) Allah

                          -- Compare to

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/15/vers/13?handschrift=163
                          line 9 - Way (of) the former (people)

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/18/vers/55?handschrift=163
                          line 3 - Way (of) the former (people)

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/33/vers/38?handschrift=107
                          last line ( the) Way (of) Allah

                          again same in ?new? manuscripts slight nuance/distinction ?

                          1777 sunnata/manner from hence sent we of before you from messengers ours and not thou find lisunnatina/to manner its ours turning

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/17/vers/77/handschrift/163

                          https//i.postimg.cc/Dzqvvbpr/ch17v67-79.jpg

                          Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                          likewise it was already shown to you numerous times that the oldest manuscripts "consistently" spelled abraham (same word/person) in all chapters and chapter 2 "inconsistency" appears ~200+ years afterwards and likewise the new verse arrangement separating 18 of ?29? initialed chapters into separate verses, etc.

                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/124?handschrift=163

                          https//i.postimg.cc/XYL4G0ch/ch2v121-132.jpg

                          1. 21 alif lam meem such the book not doubt in it guidance for the righteous
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/1?handschrift=116

                          2. 31 alif lam meem the god not deity except he the alive the sustainer
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/3/vers/1/handschrift/116

                          3. 71 alif lam meem saad book descends to you so not beeth in breast your critical from it to thou warn with it and reminder to the believers
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/7/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          4. 101 alif lam ra those signs the book the wise

                          5. 111 alif lam ra book are perfected signs/verses its furthermore explained from one who wise aware

                          6. 121 alif lam ra those signs the book the clear

                          7. 131 alif lam meem ra those signs the book and the which descends to you from lord your the truth and however more the humankind not believing

                          8. 141 alif lam ra book descends we it to you that thou evict the humankind from the darkness to the light by permission lord theirs to path the mighty the praiseworthy

                          9. 151 alif lam ra those signs the book and qur?an/recitation clear

                          10. 191 kaaf ha ya ain saad remembrance mercy lord your devotee his zakariyya
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/19/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          11. 201 ta ha not descends we of upon you the qur?an/recitation that thou agonize
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          12. 261 ta seen mim those signs the book the clear
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/26/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          13. 271 ta seen those signs the qur?an/recitation and book clear

                          14. 281 ta seen mim those signs the book the clear
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/28/vers/1?handschrift=107

                          15. 291 alif lam meem do calculate the humankind that left they of that speaketh they of believe we of and they not tested being
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/29/vers/1/handschrift/107

                          16. 301 alif lam meem ghalabat/triumph the romans
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/30/vers/1/handschrift/107

                          17. 311 alif lam meem those signs the book the wise
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/31/vers/1/handschrift/107

                          18. 321 alif lam meem revelation the book not doubt in it from lord the world?s inhabitants
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/32/vers/1/handschrift/107

                          19. 361 ya seen and the qur?an/recitation the wise
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/36/vers/1/handschrift/107

                          20. 381 saad and the qur?an/recitation owner the reminder

                          21. 401 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the knower
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/40/vers/1?handschrift=163

                          22. 411 ha meem revelation from the almighty the merciful
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/41/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          23. 421 ha meem ayn seen qaf like such inspired to you and toward the ones from before you the god the mighty the wise
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/42/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          24. 431 ha meem and the book the clear
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/43/vers/1?handschrift=163

                          25. 441 ha meem and the book the clear
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/44/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          26. 451 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the wise
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/45/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          27. 461 ha meem revelation the book from the god the mighty the wise
                            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/46/vers/1/handschrift/163

                          28. 501 qaf and the qur?an/recitation the glorious

                          29. 681 noon wal-qalami/and the pen and what they write being

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Offline
                            I Offline
                            ibn_a
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #91

                            Salaam,

                            it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                            Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                            • I gave you some examples of differences in spelling of words from what you consider" consistent oldest manuscripts"

                            • The particular spelling in current manuscript and in some older manuscripts is for a purpose and is not the result of inconsistency,
                              otherwise this would condradict with Quran verses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

                            likewise it was already shown to you numerous times that the oldest manuscripts "consistently" spelled abraham (same word/person) in all chapters and chapter 2 "inconsistency" appears ~200+ years afterwards and likewise the new verse arrangement separating 18 of 29 initialed chapters into separate verses, etc.

                            There is no logique in changing the spelling only in chapter 2 for the word Ibraheem,
                            and changing the arrangement of the initialed chapters only in 19 chapters and not in the rest of the 29 initialed chapters,
                            they must have had a source for these particular spellings and arrangement of verses.

                            Allah knows best.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I Offline
                              I Offline
                              ibn_a
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #92

                              Salaam,

                              Oldest manuscripts are consistent while those ~200 years afterward contain inconsistencies.

                              Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                              Manuscript line 7

                              Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                              So said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved from his people, "Not we see you but a man like us, and not we see you followed except those who (are) the lowest of us immature in opinion. And not we see in you over us any merit; nay, we think you (are) liars."

                              compare to

                              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                              Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                              Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                              But said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved among his people, "This is not but a man like you, he wishes to assert (his) superiority over you, and if Allah had willed surely He (would have) sent down Angels. Not we heard of this from our forefathers.

                              I believe that the current manuscript with the particular spelling of some words is the same as the original manuscript.
                              And that in some other manuscripts some of this particular spelling was lost by some scribes thinking that the same words should be spelled the same way,
                              not aware that this particular spelling was intended for a purpose.
                              Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                              Allah knows best.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Noon_waalqalami
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #93
                                • I gave you some examples of differences in spelling of words from what you consider" consistent oldest manuscripts"

                                peace, again you gave examples same root slight nuance of words spelled consistently the same in the oldest and newest manuscripts ? and again, see usage each word slightly distinct in the same verse.

                                1777 sunnata/mannerism ... lisunnatina/to manner it ours
                                3938 biramatin/in mercy its ... ramatihi/mercy it his

                                Furthermore these are consistent and spelled exactly the same each occurrence.

                                the examples
                                abraham (again spelled consistently with ch 2 in oldest manuscripts)

                                Likewise clear looking at oldest manuscripts preserved in German, French, and British Library?s etc., that verse # s are ?man-made? i.e. no consistency and probably used by scribes back then as check-sum arrangement/s.

                                The British Library?s oldest Qur?an manuscript now online
                                http//britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/asian-and-african/2016/04/the-british-librarys-oldest-quran-manuscript-now-online.html

                                http//www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=or_2165_fs001r

                                https//i.postimg.cc/8cVXRQc2/ch35v40-ch36v4.jpg

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #94

                                  Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                                  Manuscript line 7

                                  Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                                  compare to

                                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                                  Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                                  Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                                  Allah knows best.

                                  likewise perhaps study/read carefully less counting stuff you'll see it is correct.
                                  qur'an to write "they" trailing alif dropped insert (done for numerous words).

                                  https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                                  https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                                  1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                                  2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                                  2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                                  https//i.postimg.cc/XNcpySrb/ch23v23-35.jpg

                                  peace!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    ibn_a
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #95

                                    Salaam,

                                    likewise perhaps study/read carefully less counting stuff you'll see it is correct.
                                    qur'an to write "they" trailing alif dropped insert (done for numerous words).

                                    https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                                    https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                                    1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                                    2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                                    2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                                    For me the current manuscript is correct, preserved by God, and the particular spelling is intended for a purpose

                                    I think that the particular spelling of some words in the Quran we have today is not inconsistent, it is for a purpose and in time the purpose will be revealed by God.

                                    Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                                    There is no logique in saying that the scribes changed the spelling of the word Ibraheem only in chapter 2 and not in the rest of the Quran, they must have had a source for these particular spellings.

                                    Cautious when saying "inconsistent" about the current manuscript especially when in condradiction with Quran veses referring to the the preservation of the Quran by God.

                                    It was your claim about inconsistencies

                                    it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                                    Why do you consider this with an extra alif NOT consistent

                                    it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                                    NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

                                    1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                    1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                    1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
                                    1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
                                    1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

                                    These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

                                    259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
                                    2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                    2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
                                    2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
                                    5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

                                    and consider this with an extra Waw consistent

                                    Salaam,

                                    Another example of what you consider " inconsistent" from what you consider "consistent oldest manuscripts"

                                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/27?handschrift=163

                                    Manuscript line 7

                                    Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma naraka illa basharan mithlana wama naraka ittabaAAaka illa allatheena hum arathiluna badiya alrra/yi wama nara lakum AAalayna min fadlin bal nathunnukum kathibeena

                                    So said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved from his people, "Not we see you but a man like us, and not we see you followed except those who (are) the lowest of us immature in opinion. And not we see in you over us any merit; nay, we think you (are) liars."

                                    compare to

                                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/23/vers/24?handschrift=163

                                    Manuscript line 2 with an extra Waw between the letter Laam and the letter Alif

                                    Faqala almalao allatheena kafaroo min qawmihi ma hatha illa basharun mithlukum yureedu an yatafaddala AAalaykum walaw shaa Allahu laanzala mala-ikatan ma samiAAna bihatha fee aba-ina al-awwaleena

                                    But said the chiefs (of) those who disbelieved among his people, "This is not but a man like you, he wishes to assert (his) superiority over you, and if Allah had willed surely He (would have) sent down Angels. Not we heard of this from our forefathers.

                                    I believe that the current manuscript with the particular spelling of some words is the same as the original manuscript.
                                    And that in some other manuscripts some of this particular spelling was lost by some scribes thinking that the same words should be spelled the same way,
                                    not aware that this particular spelling was intended for a purpose.
                                    Like the example of the word Ibraheem , spelled without Ya in chapter 2 and spelled with Ya in the rest of the Quran.

                                    Allah knows best.

                                    7228

                                    LiyaAAlama an qad ablaghoo risalati rabbihim waahata bima ladayhim waahsa kulla shayin AAadadan

                                    That He may make evident that indeed, they have conveyed (the) Messages (of) their Lord; and He has encompassed what (is) with them and He takes account (of) all things (in) number."

                                    Allah knows best.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      Noon_waalqalami
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #96

                                      For me the current manuscript is correct, preserved by God, and the particular spelling is intended for a purpose
                                      and consider this with an extra Waw consistent

                                      7228

                                      peace, not sure which quran (or from which numerology site) you are using since current and oldest manuscripts spell it correctly and grammatically etc., already explained and you ignore.

                                      https//free-minds.org/quran/A/23#24

                                      https//quran.com/23/24?translations=20

                                      1127 so said the council of the ones reject they of from folk his
                                      2324 so said the council they of the ones reject they of
                                      2333 and said the council of from folk his the ones reject they of

                                      Those infatuated with number want to use simpleton numerology/mindless counting to change the text and ignore and/or override the preserved record from close to the time of revelation? another example.

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/Kv0Y2VGD/ch23v14-24.jpg

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/Qt9kr1Zj/ch72v18-ch73v9.jpg

                                      have nice life!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Offline
                                        I Offline
                                        ibn_a
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #97

                                        Salaam,

                                        When you say " current manuscript/s not consistent ".

                                        it's not about original (same word/phrases need to be consistent) see examples.

                                        NOT consistent extra alif 130140500130 in current manuscript/s and should be...

                                        1317 ... yaribu/striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                        1425 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                        1445 ... waarabn/and strike we of for you l-amthla/the examples
                                        1674 so not tarib/thou strike ye of to god l-amthla/the examples
                                        1748 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of

                                        These verses consistent in current manuscript/s (no extra alif) as in oldest manuscripts...

                                        259 observe how arab/strike they of to you l-amthla/the examples so astray they of so not capable being path of
                                        2435 ... wayaribu/and striketh the god l-amthla/the examples
                                        2539 ... arabn/strike we of to him l-amthla/the examples
                                        2943 and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind and not understand them except the knowing
                                        5921 ... and those l-amthlu/the examples naribuh/we strike them to the humankind perhaps they reflecting

                                        Peace, not hafs/warsh rather compare oldest manuscripts to new (obvious consistency errors).

                                        3182 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness (with alif) to the devotees?

                                        851 such in what have set forth hands yours and that the god not is biallmin/in darkness (no alif?) to the devotees?

                                        Then you have to come up with a logical explanation for this

                                        159 Indeed, We We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We of it (are) surely Guardians.

                                        4141 Indeed, those who disbelieve in the Reminder when it comes to them. And indeed, it (is) surely a Book mighty.
                                        4142 Not comes to it the falsehood from before it and not from behind it. A Revelation from (the) All-Wise, (the) Praiseworthy.

                                        5677 Indeed, it (is) surely, a Quran noble,
                                        5678 In a Book well-guarded

                                        7228 So as to make manifest that they have delivered the messages of their Lord, and He encompasses all that is with them, and He has counted everything in numbers.

                                        8521 Nay! It (is) a Quran Glorious,
                                        8522 In a Tablet, Guarded.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Noon_waalqalami
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #98

                                          Then you have to come up with a logical explanation for this

                                          159 Indeed, We We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed, We of it (are) surely Guardians.

                                          4141 Indeed, those who disbelieve in the Reminder when it comes to them. And indeed, it (is) surely a Book mighty.
                                          4142 Not comes to it the falsehood from before it and not from behind it. A Revelation from (the) All-Wise, (the) Praiseworthy.

                                          5677 Indeed, it (is) surely, a Quran noble,
                                          5678 In a Book well-guarded

                                          7228 So as to make manifest that they have delivered the messages of their Lord, and He encompasses all that is with them, and He has counted everything in numbers.

                                          8521 Nay! It (is) a Quran Glorious,
                                          8522 In a Tablet, Guarded.

                                          Peace not about guarding text which anyone can change, edit, delete, etc. at any time or guarding text ?before it? is written (irrational!) rather ?the reminder? does not contain falsehood ?before it? i.e. pertaining to prior events mentioned and neither future events ?behind it? foretold to occur.

                                          Likewise not about infactuation with certain ?number/s? which are counteless.

                                          92 naturally occurring elements
                                          2.98 * (10^4) = 29,800 meters/sec speed of the earth in orbit floating around the sun
                                          2 * (10^5) = 200,000 meters/sec speed solar system in orbit around milky way galaxy

                                          2130-33 do they not see the ones reject they of anna (i.e. ?an inna?/that indeed) the heavens and the land be dual sewn of so ripped we them dual and made we of from the water each thing live then so not believing and made we of in the land firm peaks that shake with them and made we of therein ravine of paths of perhaps they guided being and made we of the heaven/sky roof of safeguard of and they about signs its away turning and he the one creation of the night and the daytime and the sun and the moon each (i.e. all prior mentioned above) in vessel sailing/floating

                                          http//d1jqu7g1y74ds1.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tumblr_mj0vvcqnZx1qdlh1io1_400.gif

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users