Inheritance according to Qur?an

Mazhar

This is where the basic fault lies which you wish not to rectify.

only males breastfeed?
2233 awladahunna/children (masculine pl.) theirs

It is NOT masculine plural.

Please take some little time to study about broken plurals.

Mazhar

http//only males fast?
2185 falyasumhu/so should he (i.e. said person) fast it

It is just mockery.

It is apodosis clause. Condition clause is with Relative Pronoun, whoever. someone.

Noon_waalqalami

It is NOT masculine plural.
Please take some little time to study about broken plurals.

http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=233#(22333)

thread is on inheritance which you are clueless on simple shares like parents and daughters.

here is an updated inheritance distributions summary

https//i.postimg.cc/V6tdQb97/inheritance1.jpg

https//i.postimg.cc/yY8s0ZJw/inheritance2.jpg

Mazhar

http//corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(22333)

thread is on inheritance which you are clueless on simple shares like parent and daughter.

here is an updated inheritance distributions summary

https//i.postimg.cc/V6tdQb97/inheritance1.jpg

https//i.postimg.cc/yY8s0ZJw/inheritance2.jpg

This is from your mind and of some others. It is NOT in Qur'an.

Show me where it is written that 1/3 is for son.

Mazhar

Quote from Mazhar on Today at 050121 PM
It is NOT masculine plural.
Please take some little time to study about broken plurals.

http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=233#(22333)

It is incorrect entry. Kais has poor knowledge of Arabic grammar. He is simply computer expert. Hundreds of mistakes I corrected for him.

Correct your perception, read about it in the Article at Para 29

http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

Noon_waalqalami

This is from your mind and of some others. It is NOT in Qur'an.

Show me where it is written that 1/3 is for son.

see chart e.g. when exactly two daughters, son, and parents

411 in awladikum/offspring/children yours
lildhakari/to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion l-unthayayni/the two (females)
and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him (said person) offspring

btw, you still own us answers to all prior questions asked of you, likewise 6100-101 "in context" please?

only males fast?
2185 falyasumhu/so should he (i.e. said person) fast it

only due to male child?
2233 biwaladiha/in (due to) child (masculine noun) hers

only males enter heaven?
413 yudkhilhu/entered him (i.e. said person) gardens flow

697 who work righteous of from dhakarin/male or untha/female wahuwa/and he (said person) muminun/believer ...
2810 ... if not that strengthened we of upon heart hers surely she being of l-muminina/the believers (masculine pl.)

Cerberus

Isn't a "person" masculine in arabic ? Masculine not male. You can't conclude the gender of said person just because it's a masculine pronoun used. If in a situation of multiple females and only one male it still referred to with plural masculine. Meaning that the only reason one would need to specify that it's female only or male only is to make the specification and that it's mixed/irrelevant genders by default. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also it seems like this was the case with english too

Alongside they, it was acceptable to use the pronoun he to refer to an indefinite person of any gender, as in the following
"No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality." ?Article 15, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (194.

https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

It was probably for patriarchal reasons.

"To the male the share of the two females" (also for patriarchal reasons?) where is it in your table ?

huruf

UQ called it rethorical gender, in Spanish it is called "unmarked gender" it is the same form as masculine, but it is not masculine but unmarked, and it is not a question merely of males or not males, since things also have a grammatical gender, so much in Spanish as in Arabic and other languages. So in fact the unmarked gender is applied also where things are of different grammatical gender.

I know UQ called it rethorical, I do not know in English grammar speech whether that is the used term or not.

I ery much doubt that it is a question of patriarchy or not. Fibally language is the one thing in which women have had at least as much say, if not in Academia, at least in usage. Adn of course language reflects the society so it seems logical that "masculine" as deified, to the point of calling the unmarked gender masculine, but I think that whatgever it is called its usage goes back to much more elemnrtary and matriarchal concepts.

Salaam

Mazhar

see chart e.g. when exactly two daughters, son, and parents

411 in awladikum/offspring/children yours
lildhakari/to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion l-unthayayni/the two (females)
and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him (said person) offspring

btw, you still own us answers to all prior questions asked of you, likewise 6100-101 "in context" please?

only males fast?
2185 falyasumhu/so should he (i.e. said person) fast it

only due to male child?
2233 biwaladiha/in (due to) child (masculine noun) hers

only males enter heaven?
413 yudkhilhu/entered him (i.e. said person) gardens flow

697 who work righteous of from dhakarin/male or untha/female wahuwa/and he (said person) muminun/believer ...
2810 ... if not that strengthened we of upon heart hers surely she being of l-muminina/the believers (masculine pl.)

Now it is total mockery.

Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

Allah the Exalted is enjoining-binding you people (the Mankind) concerning children (offspring) of you people ?

The equivalent of the allocation for the two females shall become the comparable measure - commensurate (-&#1604 for the male in your children.

Thereby, instead of a male co-sharer, if they (children) were womenfolk (three or more) who have become more than two females referred to above, thereat, two-thirds of that which he (the deceased parent) has left, shall be the allocation for collective sharing by them (offspring).

And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

Mazhar

Quote
Quote from Mazhar on Today at 050121 PM
It is NOT masculine plural.
Please take some little time to study about broken plurals.

http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=233#(22333)

It is incorrect entry. Kais has poor knowledge of Arabic grammar. He is simply computer expert. Hundreds of mistakes I corrected for him.

Correct your perception, read about it in the Article at Para 29

http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

Have you corrected your understanding about this noun. Unless you study about nouns in Arabic, pronouns, Relative nouns, gender is singular nouns and gender in plural nouns, and then learn anaphora resolution, till then you will keep wandering.

Noon_waalqalami

Now it is total mockery.

Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
IF 3+ daughters they get 2/32/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

Noon_waalqalami

"To the male the share of the two females" (also for patriarchal reasons?) where is it in your table ?

peace, doesn't say male always gets twice each female rather to the male/s = exactly two females (hence two have to be present to apply)

https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

https//i.postimg.cc/D0vSsLwp/inheritance1.jpg

https//i.postimg.cc/XYf0Mh8F/inheritance2.jpg

Mazhar

Quote from Mazhar on Today at 052319 AM
Now it is total mockery.

Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
IF 3+ daughters they get 2/32/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

Noon_waalqalami

What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

as predicted clueless ran away/dodged simple question to allocate parents and daughter?

2233
not made to suffer parent (maternal) biwaladiha/in (due to) child hers
and not parent (paternal) to him biwaladihi/in (due to) child his

411
and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him walad/child
so if not beeth for him (said person) walad/child and inherit him parents dual his so to mother his the third (1/3)

6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad/offspring and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

1977 have so seen thou the one reject in signs ours and said surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring of

3133 O you the humankind heeds ye of lord yours and fears ye of day of not availed parent about waladihi/offspring his

723 and indeed he exalted majesty lord ours not has taken companion his and not waladan/offspring of

again, by translating walad/son (erroneous!) you ignorantly attributed to the almighty having daughters!

peace!

Mazhar

Quote from Mazhar on Today at 123126 PM
What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.