In depth study on Salaat in Quran
-
salaam,
When Muhammad started prohibiting what God has made lawful, I wouldn't call it making a mistake; what I would say is that he made a catastrophic mistake
According to the Quran, inventing false interdictions is the most serious sin in Islam and is tantamount to idol worship, as creating and following false prohibitions is like following satan
16116 You shall not utter lies with your own tongues stating "This is lawful, and this is unlawful," to fabricate lies and attribute them to GOD. Surely, those who fabricate lies and attribute them to GOD will never succeed.
460 Have you noted those who claim that they believe in what was revealed to you, and in what was revealed before you, then uphold the unjust laws of their idols? They were commanded to reject such laws. Indeed, it is the devil's wish to lead them far astray.Creating false prohibitions is creating false idols.
There are other verses in the Quran that show that Muhammad made mistakes as well, for instance when he was more afraid of people's judgment that upholding God's laws instead .
3337 Recall that you said to the one who was blessed by GOD, and blessed by you, "Keep your wife and reverence GOD," and you hid inside yourself what GOD wished to proclaim. Thus, you feared the people, when you were supposed to fear only GOD. When Zeid was completely through with his wife, we had you marry her, in order to establish the precedent that a man may marry the divorced wife of his adopted son. GOD's commands shall be done.
Same thing when Muhammad rejected the poor blind man (801-10) whose heart was filled with faith in God, and frowned, rejecting him, as he was full of reverence and respect for the rich man instead. It is the same tragic mistakes that we see every day around us, when people are impressed by people with money, degrees, power, even though they are very often unrighteous and dishonnest; but poor people with a good heart, God fearing, they treat them like garbage.
Muhammad was a very imperfect human being, like all of us, like Rashad, and it is why messengers are always rejected, as people who are idol worshipers expect infallible humans to be able to believe in them; they invent lies about messengers claiming they don't make mistakes, as sunnis do for instance.
If Muhammad had not stopped making false prohibitions, he would have gone to hell.
Pierre
salaam,
When Muhammad started prohibiting what God has made lawful, I wouldn't call it making a mistake; what I would say is that he made a catastrophic mistake
According to the Quran, inventing false interdictions is the most serious sin in Islam and is tantamount to idol worship, as creating and following false prohibitions is like following satan
16116 You shall not utter lies with your own tongues stating "This is lawful, and this is unlawful," to fabricate lies and attribute them to GOD. Surely, those who fabricate lies and attribute them to GOD will never succeed.
460 Have you noted those who claim that they believe in what was revealed to you, and in what was revealed before you, then uphold the unjust laws of their idols? They were commanded to reject such laws. Indeed, it is the devil's wish to lead them far astray.Creating false prohibitions is creating false idols.
There are other verses in the Quran that show that Muhammad made mistakes as well, for instance when he was more afraid of people's judgment that upholding God's laws instead .
3337 Recall that you said to the one who was blessed by GOD, and blessed by you, "Keep your wife and reverence GOD," and you hid inside yourself what GOD wished to proclaim. Thus, you feared the people, when you were supposed to fear only GOD. When Zeid was completely through with his wife, we had you marry her, in order to establish the precedent that a man may marry the divorced wife of his adopted son. GOD's commands shall be done.
Are u blind or u believe rashad kahalifa as he interpreted it the ways bukhari and tabari did
god talking to the messenger 1st sentence
Recall that you said to the one who was blessed by GOD, and blessed by you,
the messenger talking to the 3rd person, in this second sentence, its about this 3rd person not fearing allah, read it again sentence by sentence, don't follow khalifa blindly
"Keep your wife and reverence GOD," and you hid inside yourself what GOD wished to proclaim. Thus, you feared the people, when you were supposed to fear only GOD.who is Zayd? what does zayd in arabic mean? how did khalifa know that zayd is a name and doesn't mean increase? that is so hypocrit of khalifa to learn from hadith and play like he rejected them
Same thing when Muhammad rejected the poor blind man (801-10)
whose heart was filled with faith in God, and frowned, rejecting him, as he was full of reverence and respect for the rich man instead.
how do u know the verse is talking about mohamed, the verse talks about a 3rd person, HEIt is the same tragic mistakes that we see every day around us, when people are impressed by people with money, degrees, power, even though they are very often unrighteous and dishonnest; but poor people with a good heart, God fearing, they treat them like garbage.
So these are the caracter of prophet mohamed, well if this is true, than the whole quran is to be rejected, i don't believe in crooks and whatever they bring, if mohamed was so Evil he's not worth to be followed, maybe khalifa was so pure, he's god after all, well rashad khalifa is worth worshipping, a pure temporary godMuhammad was a very imperfect human being, like all of us, like Rashad, and it is why messengers are always rejected, as people who are idol worshipers expect infallible humans to be able to believe in them; they invent lies about messengers claiming they don't make mistakes, as sunnis do for instance.
Nope, you're wrong, messengers were chosen, the best of the imperfect people, no one is perfect but still, they're the best of us. or maybe you are a little bit better than prophet mohamed, specially faith in your heart, after all mohamed was an evil man and you're are a god alone person of the rashad khalifa follower. respectIf Muhammad had not stopped making false prohibitions, he would have gone to hell.
After all your statements, maybe he is in hell after all, specially
Prophet mohamed is your enemy, u have to expose him and if u can't u can follow interpretations of liars like khalifa and ibnkathir and bukhari etc.. don't even learn arabic, they do it for u , what do u say about the biggest MOUSHRIK ? rashad khalifa who calls Satan a GOD ? Oh!!! let me answer, god did send moushriks as messengers ! -
Why do Submitters worship rashad khalifa ? they can't stop talking about him ! try to argue with everybody about him , why is that? why they lie to themselves to cover up the child molester with the mistakes of messengers? why do I have to believe in Khalifa who didn't bring any prouf from god to prouve his messnegership ? why didn't he just bring a book like all messengers did ?
Why rashad khalifa pray 5 times a day and broke a major Rule in the Quran , that is we do not follow what our forefathers did, becausewe have the book, and why are submitters fighting for the 5 prayers to beck up khalifa claim of messengerhood ?
why there is not even one verse that talks about the 5 salat? they have to twist words and meanings to squeeze 5 or 6 salats?
Worship worship code19 and khalifa, that is the reason and they don't even think that it is the reason, they don't even think they're no different than sunnis and shiaa, they actually folloed them in the interpretations about mohamed and in the 5 zorostarian prayersLast
Rashad said he represent the mahdi the muslims pray for, the messaiah jews are waitig for , the christ, the christians are waiting for
when i read the quran , jesus was dead and messiah came and gone , and the mehdi doesn't exist, so all these 3 are lies of sects and falshood , does ' it mean khalifa said he represent falshood? ? -
@ loxbox
Your message of 140&141 are coming from a person who can not hold civilised conversation and a soon as feels defeated resort to using abusive language.
Please first learn some manner then talk about God?.Would you think nasty talking will take you to paradise?!
God is doing every thing?.Glory be to God that exposed your true colour....Would you call yourself a believer?WoWWWWW!
Asana
-
@ loxbox
Your message of 140&141 are coming from a person who can not hold civilised conversation and a soon as feels defeated resort to using abusive language.
Please first learn some manner then talk about God?.Would you think nasty talking will take you to paradise?!
God is doing every thing?.Glory be to God that exposed your true colour....Would you call yourself a believer?WoWWWWW!
Asana
Sorry if I offended u , just said what i think , she doesn't respect messengers , except khalifa . sounds to me a bit arrogant that's all
-
Peace progressive
Asana
Prophet as human being made/committed mistakes but not as a messenger.
Sounds to me TRUEProphet knew what was Halal or Haram; he only committed sin there by not obeying God and His message.
Sounds to me that the prophet didn't make a law to make something haram, if he did , allah would have cutt off hisheart, his did abstein from something he likes to please hiw wives or avoid problemes with his wivesProphet as messenger never made mistakes about the message?.he failed to deliver the message or obey it??.it means that he knew the message but failed to deliver it.
AGREEIf you?d like to say Rashad made mistakes, you should specify which Rashad, as a messenger or as a human beings.
Both, to me revelation is taught by god to his messengers, so they must be perfect in understanding and explaining the message, no matter what language he is using, because allah sent the messengers with the language of their peopleIf you?d like to say he as a messenger made mistakes in observing the correct way of Salat, Zakat and Hajj then by all means you?re accusing God that He sent us an astray man as His messenger to lead the prayer ,it means that he deliverd the wrong message,it means that either he misunderstood God's message to deliver it to us or failed to obey God and said it out of his own desire ,which one is?
I'm not accusing god as sending him, I feel like he's a self proclaimed messenger, that's all, and after all he's dead, why should i follow him, i have the quran, and I believe that the quran is the words of Allah, word per word, without needing any code to prouve it to me, so code 19 or no code 19 , the quran is the word of god wit no doubt.And if you?d like to say he made mistakes in his translation then again you should know that God sends the messengers with Books to preach?.If he misunderstood the message of the Quran to preach it to us then what?s the point he was sent to preach it to us in first place?What's the point a messenger teach the wrong teaching to us?
I don't know what to say, I see submitters do different than the teachings of the quran, the times of salat is one example, u take your time from abraham, I take the times from the quran, there is a big difference to me.I admit that there are grammatical mistakes and some words missed out to be translated or structures of his sentences are not perfect but it doesn?t mean that he misunderstood the message.
I don't know about thisIf you?d like to find out about those who claim that their understanding is so correct criticizing Rashad in some extend that have taken the lead to issue new way of observing Salat ,Zakat and Hajj then look at the below verse in order to see how bizarre this translation is when it comes to just a simple verse?.
I seen some people understand the quran way better than khalifa, their explanation makes perfect sense, khalifa is the master of numerology, i canno tveify him to believe in him or not, to me he didn't bring any miracle, if 19 is true, it confirm more prophet mohamed as a true messenger of god, it is my opinion and i follow what makes sense to meI mentioned this to Pierre but he failed to respond?Now it?s your turn .Please look at it and see if you can notice the huge mistake and wrong understanding just over the two words ?.The translation is by Edip&Layth and Monotheist Group copy/paste it too!!
Edip
I respect a lot EDIP, I learned a lot from him1964 "We are not sent except by the command of your Lord. To Him is our present and our future, and all that is in-between. Your Lord was never to forget."
NO CLUE -
Loxbox
What would you mean by ?The?? God is called Rahim in the Quran without ?Al? too.
God is called Al-Rahman, would you know anybody can be Rahman too if we take away the ?Al? according to your understanding?
As I said before these two attributions of God only befits God to be attribute with them ?? He introduced Him to us with them and no human being posses them.
Sorry Abraham was never called merciful?.The word is Halim not Rahim.
We submitters never said or claimed that CH 74 referring to Rashad.Please check your facts first because if you don?t then it would be an accusation.
Let?s examine our faith by sharing each others? understanding not looking down on others? understanding. All of us already have been stamped by God as believers or disbelivers.The Truth of God should be followed no matter what.
Asana
Mistakes or deliberate in revelation
Y. S.* (Yaa Seen)
Footnote
And the Quran that is full of wisdom.
Most assuredly, you (Rashad) are one of the messengers.*
Footnote
On a straight path.
This revelation is from the Almighty, Most Merciful.
To warn people whose parents were never warned, and therefore, they are unaware.Why lie to yourselves ? did Rashad came to people who have never been warned before? meaning Umyeen? meaning never recieved a book ? I believe rashad knew about this but he inserted his name, he knew what he was doing ! even though the holy spirtt is talking to the one who is receiving the revelation, Mohamed, who came to people who never been warned before, so what do u thinkk of rashad? is it a mistake in revelation ? or a deliberate insertion of his name where it doesn't belong? does this make his a false prophet either way ? he kept playing of a difference between prophets and messengers and u see with your eyes that messengers receive a book, I believe u lie to yourselves just like sunnis and shiaa do
Keep telling me I'm talking with bad manners ! for the truth hurt
PeaceVerses in 741-6 are talking about some thing that has direct link to the rest of the chapters?A profound study would reveal it for you if God wills.
It's talking to a person, not about a thing, it's addressing someone prsent times in the revelation .And please remember we all strive to obey God according to our sincerity ? guidance is in Hands of God?He would guides us to the Path we choose so do not put your faith/understanding above faith of the others and give it a doubt that you might be deeply wrong.
All what sunnis do is trying to worship prophet mohamed, the same for submitters, their mission is to prouve rashad's messengership, and code19 . this is how i see them, i don't know how they really see themselves, i know they see themselves as people who hold all truth , and they want people to join them. following rashad and code19. I prefer to follow the quran of prophet Mohamed, in it's pure text, without seen names and words inserted in parentheses.We both might be ddeply wrong, I did follow rashad for a while and gave it consideration, can u give it a thought that u might be ddeply wrong?
-
U right, Rashad khalifa is perfect, we have to follow rashad khalifa
http//thethirdestate.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/picard-facepalm2.jpg
Where did I say that?
I read the quran and I see Only prophet Mohamed calling people to follow Quran alone, I never see Rashad khalfa in the quran escept in his own translation
plus why didn't rashad khalifa come with a book like all messengers ?We sent aforetime our messengers with Clear Signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance 5724
A prophet is always simultaneously a messenger, but a messenger is not always a prophet.
http//www.quran-islam.org/main_topics/prophet_and_messenger_(P1161).htmlAnd sorry for pointing that your idol is imperfect. Also see 479, 9117, 3337, 4066, 4252, 801-10 and 937. From the time he became a messenger to his death, Muhamamd was always a messenger - that means when he made mistakes, he was acting as a messenger. So you are wrong.
How come all messenger of god came with books except khalifa? I don't listen to u guys anymore because your main point in the religion is to prouve khalifa as messenger, u don't care about the quran , u care about your messenger, khalifa
Baseless assumption...
Because of your ignorance, it is pointless arguing with you.
-
Where did I say that?
Baseless assumption...
Because of your ignorance, it is pointless arguing with you.
And sorry for pointing that your idol is imperfect. Also see 479, 9117, 3337, 4066, 4252, 801-10 and 937. From the time he became a messenger to his death, Muhamamd was always a messenger - that means when he made mistakes, he was acting as a messenger. So you are wrong.
Why change the subject ? the talk is about Rashad khalifa, Sourah Ya Sin where he inserted his name
I agree with u , mohamed was indeed Evil, he might be burning in hell, that is no problem with me, I worship no pedophile .A prophet is always simultaneously a messenger, but a messenger is not always a prophet.
I don't know who to believe, u and khalifa or the Quran, the verses I posted are clear, show me a verse that says not all messengers receive a book
Answer or explain why Khalifa inserted his name in sourah Ya Sin -
Look at what god told Rashad Khalifa in the quran , this happened when Rashad khalifa was receiving the revelation of the quran 1400 years ago
That Allah may forgive thee thy faults of the past and those to follow; fulfil His favour to thee; and guide thee on the Straight Way 482
Verse 479 isn't talking about the prophet, u distord the meaning of the verses just like tabari and ibn kathir, this verse is talking to men who does't obey The messenger, read the verse before and the verse after
this verse is adressing in pluriel , those like us who doesn't obey the messageI don't want to check the other verses, this first one prouve that u distort words of allah, u r free, u have your religion and I have mine, peace, I only believe in Khalifa when someone show me that messengers do not receive a book, evidence has to be from the quran and not from any man, be it khalifa or anybody else
can u explain this 3337 ? what is wrong in this verse that has to show that mohamed made a mistake ?
Please explain it because see god praising his prophet in this verse while u see the prophet making mistake, please explain it clear, if u explain it clear, I am ready to reject mohamed and accept rashad khalifa quran as rashad is the last messenger and the holliest of the holy, Abraham and mohamed and Rashad khalifa, the three major messengres of history as rashad said, he said that about himself, self praised rashad
-
@loxbox
You make lots of baseless accusations?.This is because either you don?t study Quran or just like to go to this thread that thread say things against submitters and Dr.Khalifa teachings.
You said that he misunderstood 1928 by translating the descendant instead of sister of Harun and I asked prove it to me that Maryam had brother then I accept your criticism. You didn?t answer.
Then you said ?Al? apply to name of God therefore Rahim can be used for Mohammad. I asked you what about Rahim without Al in the Quran referring to God, again you didn?t answer.
And now;
Why lie to yourselves ? did Rashad came to people who have never been warned before? meaning Umyeen?
Can you please tell me were the Children of Israel omi according to you when God kept sending them prophets and messengers?
Where about in the Quran God says that He would send Warners only to those who are omi??
Keep telling me I'm talking with bad
manners ! for the truth hurt
,What truth so far have you told us except bunch of misunderstanding of the verses or baseless accusations?
1964 "We are not sent except by the command of your Lord. To Him is our present and our future, and all that is in-between. Your Lord was never to forget."
NO CLUEIf you or anybody else beside you can?t see the gross mistake in above translation then what makes you think that you understand the verses correctly and are on the right path?
For your information I didn?t accept/believe in Rashad as messenger of God just like that. I did my homework first through his translation and his message with will of God and His guidance then I believed in him.
Asana
-
@loxbox
Can you please tell me were the Children of Israel omi according to you when God kept sending them prophets and messengers?
Where about in the Quran God says that He would send Warners only to those who are omi??
Keep telling me I'm talking with bad,
What truth so far have you told us except bunch of misunderstanding of the verses or baseless accusations?
If you or anybody else beside you can?t see the gross mistake in above translation then what makes you think that you understand the verses correctly and are on the right path?
For your information I didn?t accept/believe in Rashad as messenger of God just like that. I did my homework first through his translation and his message with will of God and His guidance then I believed in him.
Asana
You make lots of baseless accusations?.This is because either you don?t study Quran or just like to go to this thread that thread say things against submitters and Dr.Khalifa teachings.
I didn't know that khalifa had his own teachings that we must follow !!!!You said that he misunderstood 1928 by translating the descendant instead of sister of Harun and I asked prove it to me that Maryam had brother then I accept your criticism. You didn?t answer.
Brother before i answer to u this question, we have to agree of the word oukht litterlly means sister ! if u don't agree about oukht that in arabic it means sister , than we cant continuie, if u agree , that i answer u
u asked me a question to prouve to you that miriam had a brother, I can't , i believe her brother name was Aaron, and she has another brother, his name was Moses , she is the duaghter of Imran , just like moses and aaron,
now u asked a question with no sense, i answer u this way, can u prouve that miriam didn't have a brother? her mother asked about her at birth and that made u know that she didn't have a brother? what about a younger brother? what about a brother from the father side? u can never prouve that miriam didn't have a brother, because u weren't there, not u nor khalifa.
can u agree that Oukht in Arabic means Sister or not ? go to google translator if u don't believe, the're not submitters nor sunni, they don't even believe in islam. type this in any translator in the world or ask any arabic scholar in arabic language or any kid or arabic baby, he tells u this word means sisterCan you please tell me were the Children of Israel omi according to you when God kept sending them prophets and messengers?
According to the quran, in the quran , mohamed was the ummi who came to the umiyeen and h was from the umiyeen, if u now someone else in the quran, please post the verse, that's it.Can you please tell me were the Children of Israel omi according to you when God kept sending them prophets and messengers?
I was talking about sourah Ya Sin, u didn't answer and try to change the subject , just answer who was the messenger who came to people who never been warned nor their forefather ? answer it honestly, or is it too hard to say khalifa made a mistake ?What truth so far have you told us except bunch of misunderstanding of the verses or baseless accusations?
I'm not accusing you of anything, we just debating, just talkingIf you or anybody else beside you can?t see the gross mistake in above translation then what makes you think that you understand the verses correctly and are on the right path?
If it's not in the Quran , we have to reject or not take in consideration, i posted 3 verse that say messengers came with a book, i'm still waiting for a verse that say some messengers don't come with a book; can u provide at least one verse ? if there is not, than khalifa was teaching outside of the quran. period, as simple as that, einshtein of Islam cannot turn us ashtray if we trust the quran, if it's not in the quran , it's SATAN , submiters themselves say that no ?For your information I didn?t accept/believe in Rashad as messenger of God just like that. I did my homework first through his translation and his message with will of God and His guidance then I believed in him.
in him who ? rashad or god or mohamed ? one sent the quran, one brought the quran, another modified the quran; wich one u talking about , "him" -
@loxbox
I asked you about the Edip&Layth translation regarding 1964 as you replied no CLUE as below
1964 "We are not sent except by the command of your Lord. To Him is our present and our future, and all that is in-between. Your Lord was never to forget."
NO CLUEAnd then you turned it into this to answer me which is not relevent to my question
If you or anybody else beside you can?t see the gross mistake in above translation then what makes you think that you understand the verses correctly and are on the right path?
If it's not in the Quran , we have to reject or not take in consideration, i posted 3 verse that say messengers came with a book, i'm still waiting for a verse that say some messengers don't come with a book; can u provide at least one verse ? if there is not, than khalifa was teaching outside of the quran. period, as simple as that, einshtein of Islam cannot turn us ashtray if we trust the quran, if it's not in the quran , it's SATAN , submiters themselves say that no ?I leave it to the people who read your response to judge you what a cheater you can be just because you don?t have answer to my question!!
You claim Rashad?s translation is incorrect and yet can?t prove it?you?re just beating around the bush?.Your accusation needs to be sorted out by your evidence and proof?..I didn?t claim it was wrong.
You didn?t answer the question regarding ?Al? and Rahim in the Quran.
Your baseless accusations are about submitters and Dr.Khalifa
And I repeat again you couldn?t figure out the simple but gross mistake in Edip?s translation in 1964 and yet want to distinguish between messenger and prophet in the Quran and teaching me!!
My answer for 366 too is that I, my parents and my ancestors did not receive A Warner as a Messenger in our city and country!....Did you?
1400 years gone and there was no Warner!Prophet Mohammad was sent to his people as ommiun and the people of the Book too?.He was raised among the ommiun not specifically for the ommiun?The below verse nullifies your claim
We have sent you out of mercy from us towards the whole world.
Would you think the whole world is /was ommiun?!
Asana
-
@loxbox
I asked you about the Edip&Layth translation regarding 1964 as you replied no CLUE as below
And then you turned it into this to answer me which is not relevent to my question
I leave it to the people who read your response to judge you what a cheater you can be just because you don?t have answer to my question!!
You claim Rashad?s translation is incorrect and yet can?t prove it?you?re just beating around the bush?.Your accusation needs to be sorted out by your evidence and proof?..I didn?t claim it was wrong.
You didn?t answer the question regarding ?Al? and Rahim in the Quran.
Your baseless accusations are about submitters and Dr.Khalifa
And I repeat again you couldn?t figure out the simple but gross mistake in Edip?s translation in 1964 and yet want to distinguish between messenger and prophet in the Quran and teaching me!!
My answer for 366 too is that I, my parents and my ancestors did not receive A Warner as a Messenger in our city and country!....Did you?
1400 years gone and there was no Warner!Prophet Mohammad was sent to his people as ommiun and the people of the Book too?.He was raised among the ommiun not specifically for the ommiun?The below verse nullifies your claim
We have sent you out of mercy from us towards the whole world.
Would you think the whole world is /was ommiun?!
Asana
My brother, messengers receive a book, what does the three verses i posted for ? ? ? MESSENGERS ARE PROPHETS i make a perfect distinction , maybe you are blind to don't seee it
if a messenger human isn't a prophet that allah sent many books to prophet mohamed, the book and hilkma, the quran and Mizan, the book and the criterion etc.... maybe sunnis are right, if messengers aren't prophets than the Hikma isn't the quran
U didn't answer my verses i sent to u , and u play like i'm juging and all, i don't juge u brother, allah does, i only showed u verses that say messenger receive a book, even if rashad khalifa said messengers don't receive a book, and the quran says messengers receive a book , I choose the quran on rashad khalifa
I's say the quran said the truth , in this case who says otherwise LIE , no matter how u love khalifa, no matter how to admire him, He is wrong because the quran is right -
Dear Asana and loxbox13,
Could you both take a break please..?
One of you believe Dr Rashad Kalifa as a messenger and one of you don't... don't matter. There are several other individuals (eg Ahmed Quadiyan) have claimed messengerhood and several people do follow him.
You both are using the same Quran to prove / disprove each other.... and thats not gonna happen. Because it is just the way you are understanding and interpreting things.
It is best not to overindulge or else a civilised discussion could end up otherwise.
Thanks and regards,
Br. Yushua -
Dear Asana and loxbox13,
Could you both take a break please..?
One of you believe Dr Rashad Kalifa as a messenger and one of you don't... don't matter. There are several other individuals (eg Ahmed Quadiyan) have claimed messengerhood and several people do follow him.
You both are using the same Quran to prove / disprove each other.... and thats not gonna happen. Because it is just the way you are understanding and interpreting things.
It is best not to overindulge or else a civilised discussion could end up otherwise.
Thanks and regards,
Br. YushuaHi brother, that was a while ago, I don't mind if someone believe in khalifa or not, and I don't argue about it except give my opinion if asked about it . I personnaly don't believe in khalifa, and I am not sure that THe Rassoul Ahmed came or not, and I am not sure that Muhamed is a person, because I realised that al history of Islam and hadiths are made by frensh/british , and specially the rules of Arab language are made by Sibaweh, the group that created frensh/english/spanish/hebreu languages .
I know one thing, we're all ashtray, and few limited number in the world knows the truth and th meaning of the arab coran words, the reason why we don't hear about them is they are all marginalised, by muslims in the first place.
We look for Jesus (Essai) in the East, so I am sure he's from the west, we look for Moses (Moussi) in the East, I am sure he's from the west, we look for Feraon in the south east, he must be in the north west,.
Main reason why I don't believe n Khalifa, is simple, a messenger of Allah will not be accepted by zionist government. because a true messenger seek justice in the world, and the USA is everywhere doing mischief, and yet, they adopted khalifa and promoted him without any problem.
I am sure that if a true messenger comes to the world, he's not gonna come to a mosque, but to the frensh / british / Us governments, because they rule the world and they do a lot of mischief in the world.
we can say whatever we want, as long as we don't hit the spot. (there will be no probleme with the USA or Europe. if you come up with the true meaning of the quran, than there will be a huge problem.
you want to learn about the quran, read the american constitution, read the COPY/PASTE of the family code of NAPOLEON etc.. and specially, read about the MUDAKIR , and try to understand the mudakirine, who they are , and how did they admisister the world in the past.
Peace -
Hi brother, that was a while ago, I don't mind if someone believe in khalifa or not, and I don't argue about it except give my opinion if asked about it . I personnaly don't believe in khalifa, and I am not sure that THe Rassoul Ahmed came or not, and I am not sure that Muhamed is a person, because I realised that al history of Islam and hadiths are made by frensh/british , and specially the rules of Arab language are made by Sibaweh, the group that created frensh/english/spanish/hebreu languages .
Dear brother LoxBox,
I don't find the above red highlighted part in AlQuraan. Why should I believe in it?
Why you don't believe in Hadith of Bukhari, when you believe in Hadith of others?
May Allah guide us all to His only path, AlSiraat AlMustaqeem pr
Mohammed M. Khan -
Br. Loxbox,
Thanks for your message. Your thoughts are quite interesting.
Would you like to explain a bit more please..? Sorry, if I have bearged in the middle and have asked you to go all over, again.
I am particularly bothered about Dr. Khalifa or Mirza Ahmed. But I am interested in your analogy in deriving that 'Mohamed might not be a person'
Br. Yushua
-
Salam and Peace, everyone!
1)---Salaat means "the ritual Salaat."
2)---Salaat also means "commitment to Al-Quran." (The meaning of Salaat becomes clear with reference to context. Sometimes it is only ritual, and sometimes it is commitment)After all these dabates, we have not yet reached a final method of offering "the ritual Salaat."
Why?---Perhaps, there is something missing. And that something, that is missing is,---that we must go to our Allah and request Him to guide us, because there is no one except Allah to guide His slaves.Read Al-Quran, and we will find that Allah is advising Ibraheem to offer Salaat the way He taught him to do.
It means that Allah taught Ibraheem the full method of ritual Salaat. And this full method must be in The Revelations that Ibraheem received from Allah.And because once the full method of the ritual Salaat was given to Ibraheem, and this is valid until Al-Qiyamah, so may be in the next Revelations Allah didn't mention the method of Salaat, only commanded to offer Salaat (the method of which was already given to Ibraheem).
It means the method of ritual Salaat that we follow today,---is the same method of ritual Salaat that is coming down from generation to generation since Ibraheem.
It might have been so, that at different times people added to the real Salaat, some shirk things.
And whenever Allah's Messenger came, they did away with the shirk part that misguided people had added to Salaat, purified it, and gave it to the people.The same Salaat was being offered at the time of Muhammad in Makkah. People had added shirk things again to the Salaat, and the real method was not easy to find out.
When Muhammad was declared as Messenger of Allah, he must have taken away shirk form the Salaat, purified it and gave it to ummah.Allah declares in His Exalted Quran, that His Quran is in His Protection. It means that everything in Al-Quran is in Allah's Protection. Nothing from Al-Quran will be changed or lost.
So, Salaat is one of Allah's Commandments, so Salaat is also in Allah's Protection.The way Al-Quran is coming down from generation to generation in Allah's Protection,-----the same way Salaat is also coming down from generation to generation in Allah's Protection.
Having Iman in it, we must believe that today we have the same method of ritual Salaat that was first given to Ibraheem.Al-Quran is The Light. And The Light shows people what is right and what is wrong, what is Tauheed and what is shirk.
This will be our own fault, if in spite of having Allah's Quran (Allah's Guidance), we are unable to find out the real method of Salaat.
Now, look at the method of the Salaat, we presently have,-----examine it, in The Light of The Quran,-----and whatever shirk things we find in it, we must do away with that.
Rest is absolutely okay.
Reciting from Al-Quran, standing, ruku, sajdah, everything is alright.Al-Quran, The Light,-----is Allah's Guidance,-----that will take us to the real method of the ritual Salaat.
Look at all the rituals different nations have. Our method of ritual Salaat is the best.
First you stand like an obedient slave before your Allah. Then you do ruku. Then you do sajdah.
No method, as such, is so obedient and humble as ours.=================================================================================
If there had been no Sahih Al-Bukhari, etc,---still we would have the same method of ritual Salaat that was given to Ibrheem (AS).
This is the "Millata Ibraheema (Salaat, Hujj, Umrah)" that Allah commanded the last Messenger to follow-----"Then, We inspired you (O Messenger, saying) ?Follow the religion of Abraham, exclusively devoted. And he was not of those who associated (others with Allah)." (Al-Nahl-123)
If "Millata Ibraheema (Salaat, Hujj, Umrah)" had not been in Allah's Protection and if it had been disappeared,-----why would have Allah ordered the Messenger (and the ummah) to follow it, without mentioning their methods in datail in Al-Quran?
So, the methods of "Millata Ibraheema (Salaat, Hujj, Umrah)" was already there and being practiced, so Allah didn't mention their methods in Al-Quran.
The last Messenger only purified these rituals from shirk, and ordered his ummah to follow.Salaat is not in Imam Bukhari's Protection.---Don't put the crown on his head.
Salaat is in Allah's Protection, and He knows how to protect it for His obedient slaves who do not commit shirk with Him.
As a matter of fact, I learned Salaat from my parents.---Never read Sahih Al-Bukhari.
My parents learned from their parents.---They never read Sahih Al-Bukhari.
Their parents learned from their parents.---They never read Sahih Al-Bukhari.
-----and this goes, until we reach the Prophet.
This is in Allah's Protection.Where do we find Imam Bukhari?
Peace again!
A lot of Peace!